How to Fix CVE-2022-42475: Memory Corruption in FortiProxy
Related fixes
Other vulnerabilities in the same area that are worth patching alongside this one:
- How to Fix CVE-2026-25689: Execute unauthorized code or commands in FortiDeceptor — Execute unauthorized code or commands in FortiDeceptor
- How to Fix CVE-2026-21741: Execute unauthorized code or commands in FortiNAC-F — Execute unauthorized code or commands in FortiNAC-F
- How to Fix CVE-2024-47575: FortiManager FortiJump Missing Authentication , FortiManager FortiJump Missing Authentication
- How to Fix CVE-2026-25972: Execute unauthorized code or commands in FortiSIEM , Execute unauthorized code or commands in FortiSIEM
- How to Fix CVE-2026-22629: Improper access control in FortiAnalyzer , Improper access control in FortiAnalyzer
*By Sai Kiran Pandrala*
| Severity | CVSS 9.3 - Critical |
|---|---|
| Actively exploited? | Yes, listed in CISA KEV (added 2022-12-13) |
| Affected | 7.2.0 <= 7.2.1, 7.0.0 <= 7.0.7, 2.0.0 <= 2.0.11, 1.2.0 <= 1.2.13, 1.1.0 <= 1.1.6, 1.0.0 <= 1.0.7, and others |
| Fixed in | See vendor advisory |
| Type (CWE) | CWE-197: Execute unauthorized code or commands |
Patch immediately. CISA's KEV listing means active exploitation is confirmed. Federal agencies must remediate by 2023-01-03.
What is CVE-2022-42475?
CVE-2022-42475 is a memory corruption flaw in FortiProxy. A malformed input corrupts memory state in a way that leads to remote code execution under realistic conditions. Vendor description: A heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability [CWE-122] in FortiOS SSL-VPN 7.2.0 through 7.2.2, 7.0.0 through 7.0.8, 6.4.0 through 6.4.10, 6.2.0 through 6.2.11, 6.0.15 and earlier and FortiProxy SSL-VPN 7.2.0 through 7.2.1, 7.0.7 and earlier may allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code or commands via specifically crafted requests.
Why this CVE matters
Memory-corruption flaws in a network-facing service are a perennial target for exploit developers. Modern mitigations slow but rarely stop a determined attacker, especially against embedded or appliance-class targets.
For deployments of FortiProxy that have been exposed to the public internet during the disclosure window, the operating assumption should be that scanning has already happened. Confirmed in-the-wild exploitation makes that assumption mandatory, not cautious. Patching closes the door; log review and credential rotation close out the rest of the response.
Am I affected?
You are affected if your installation matches any of these version ranges:
- FortiProxy: 7.2.0 <= 7.2.1
- FortiProxy: 7.0.0 <= 7.0.7
- FortiProxy: 2.0.0 <= 2.0.11
- FortiProxy: 1.2.0 <= 1.2.13
- FortiProxy: 1.1.0 <= 1.1.6
- FortiProxy: 1.0.0 <= 1.0.7
- FortiProxy: 7.2.0 <= 7.2.2
- FortiProxy: 7.0.0 <= 7.0.8
Check your installed version against the list above. If you cannot determine the version, treat the system as affected and follow the upgrade path below.
On FortiGate / FortiOS systems, run get system status from the CLI and compare the Version line against the affected ranges above.
How to fix CVE-2022-42475
- Read the vendor advisory in full: https://fortiguard.com/psirt/FG-IR-22-398
- Upgrade FortiProxy to the patched build listed in the vendor advisory.
- Back up the configuration (and database, where applicable) before upgrading.
- Apply the patch in a maintenance window. For HA pairs, upgrade the standby node first, fail over, then upgrade the former primary.
- Restart the affected service so the patched binary loads, then verify the new version (see verification section).
Apply the iOS / iPadOS update
# Check the current iOS build on a tethered device (libimobiledevice)
ideviceinfo -k ProductVersion
ideviceinfo -k BuildVersion
# Required iOS / iPadOS build is listed in the vendor advisory: https://fortiguard.com/psirt/FG-IR-22-398
# On-device: Settings -> General -> Software Update -> Download and Install
# Vendor advisory: https://fortiguard.com/psirt/FG-IR-22-398
# Confirm fleet iOS devices have updated (Intune example)
Connect-MgGraph -Scopes Device.Read.All
Get-MgDeviceManagementManagedDevice -Filter "operatingSystem eq 'iOS'" |
Where-Object { $_.OSVersion -lt "<fixed-version-from-advisory>" } |
Select-Object DeviceName, OSVersion, UserPrincipalName
Verify the fix landed
# 1. Confirm the running version matches the fixed-in version from the advisory:
# https://fortiguard.com/psirt/FG-IR-22-398
# Use the platform-specific version probe above.
# 2. Re-scan with your vulnerability scanner (Nessus, Qualys, Tenable, OpenVAS).
# The scanner should no longer flag CVE-2022-42475 on the patched target.
# 3. Inspect recent service / kernel logs for crash loops or rollback events.
journalctl -u <service> --since "10 minutes ago"
dmesg --since "10 minutes ago"
If you cannot patch immediately
Block network reachability to the vulnerable service from untrusted networks and apply the patched build. Memory-corruption bugs cannot be reliably mitigated at the network layer; the patch is the fix.
How to verify the fix worked
- After applying the patch, verify the running version in the product's admin UI or via the vendor-documented CLI command.
- Confirm the patched build matches the version listed in the vendor advisory.
- Run an authenticated vulnerability scan with a current signature set and confirm the scanner no longer flags CVE-2022-42475.
- Review logs for the entire pre-patch window for indicators of compromise listed in the vendor or CISA advisory.
- Confirm any network-layer mitigations that were applied as a stopgap have been reverted (or left in place intentionally) once the patch is verified.
If your installation was internet-reachable during the disclosure window, treat log review as part of the remediation rather than an optional follow-up. Look for repeated service restarts, crash logs from the affected daemon, and core files generated around the time of any anomalous traffic. A memory-corruption flaw used for exploitation often leaves a trail of failed attempts before the successful one. Because FortiProxy sits on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog for this CVE, defenders should also pull the IOC list from the vendor advisory and from CISA's analysis if one was published.
Frequently asked questions
Is CVE-2022-42475 being exploited in the wild?
Yes. CISA added CVE-2022-42475 to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, which means active exploitation has been confirmed by federal observation or credible vendor reporting.
Will a WAF or IDS rule fully mitigate CVE-2022-42475?
No. Network-layer filters can reduce noise and slow opportunistic scanners, but they will not stop a determined attacker. The vendor patch is the only durable fix.
How long should I plan for the upgrade?
Typical vendor-documented upgrade windows for FortiProxy run from a few minutes to under an hour depending on cluster size. Test in a staging environment first and follow the vendor's documented HA upgrade order.
References
- Official vendor advisory: https://fortiguard.com/psirt/FG-IR-22-398
- NVD entry: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-42475
- CISA KEV catalog: https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog
- Additional vendor or research reference: https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2022-42475
*This guide was assembled from the official vendor advisory, the NVD record, and the CISA KEV catalog entry on 2026-05-25. Always confirm against the vendor advisory before applying changes in production.*