⚠ Reference material — not professional advice. Test in staging, back up first, verify against your specific version. Use your own judgment for your environment.
● Medium · CVSS 5.3

How to Fix CVE-2026-1149: Command Injection in LR350

Other vulnerabilities in the same area that are worth patching alongside this one:

*By Sai Kiran Pandrala*

⚡ At a glance
SeverityCVSS 5.3 - Medium
Actively exploited?Not currently listed in CISA KEV
Affected9.3.5u.6369_B20220309
Fixed inSee vendor advisory
Type (CWE)CWE-77: Command Injection

What is CVE-2026-1149?

CVE-2026-1149 is an OS command injection bug in LR350. The product builds a shell command from untrusted input without escaping, so injected metacharacters run as the service account, often root or SYSTEM. Vendor description: A vulnerability was identified in Totolink LR350 9.3.5u.6369_B20220309. This issue affects the function setDiagnosisCfg of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi of the component POST Request Handler.

Why this CVE matters

Command injection in a network appliance or management console gives the attacker the same privileges as the service account, which is usually root or SYSTEM. From there, persistence, lateral movement, and credential theft follow with off-the-shelf tooling.

For deployments of LR350 that have been exposed to the public internet during the disclosure window, the operating assumption should be that scanning has already happened. Even where exploitation has not been publicly observed, scanning for the vulnerable fingerprint is cheap and routine. Patching closes the door; log review and credential rotation close out the rest of the response.

Am I affected?

You are affected if your installation matches any of these version ranges:

Check your installed version against the list above. If you cannot determine the version, treat the system as affected and follow the upgrade path below.

Open LR350's About dialog or run the vendor-documented version-check command. Compare the result against the affected ranges in the advisory.

How to fix CVE-2026-1149

The fix is to apply the patched build listed in the Totolink advisory.

Affected versions confirmed in the CVE record:

Patch via the OS package manager (Linux)


<!-- enrich_agent_2:v1 -->
# 1. Update the package metadata.
sudo apt update                                  # Debian / Ubuntu
sudo dnf check-update                            # RHEL / Rocky / AlmaLinux / Fedora
sudo zypper refresh                              # openSUSE

# 2. Pull the patched version listed in the [vendor advisory](https://vuldb.com/?id.341742) of LR350 from Totolink.
sudo apt install --only-upgrade lr350
sudo dnf upgrade lr350
sudo zypper update lr350

# 3. Restart the affected service so the patched binary is the running binary.
sudo systemctl restart lr350 || true

# 4. Verify the running version.
lr350 --version

Verify the fix worked


<!-- enrich_agent_2:v1 -->
# 1. Confirm the running version matches the fixed-in version from the advisory.
#    Cross-check against the vendor advisory: https://vuldb.com/?id.341742

# 2. Re-scan with your vulnerability scanner. The scanner should no longer flag
#    this CVE on the patched host.
# Example with Nmap NSE:
nmap -sV --script vuln <target-host>

# 3. Inspect the service / kernel logs for crash-loops or rollback events in
#    the first hour after the upgrade.
journalctl -u <service-name> --since "1 hour ago"
dmesg --since "1 hour ago"

If you cannot patch immediately

Restrict access to the management or affected endpoint at the network layer. If the vendor lists a configuration toggle that disables the vulnerable feature, use it until you can patch.

How to verify the fix worked

If your installation was internet-reachable during the disclosure window, treat log review as part of the remediation rather than an optional follow-up. Look for unexpected administrator accounts in LR350, scheduled tasks or cron jobs you did not create, new files in web-accessible directories, and outbound connections to addresses not in your baseline. Suspicious requests to the vulnerable endpoint immediately followed by successful 200-class responses with unusually large bodies are a strong indicator of exploitation.

Frequently asked questions

Is CVE-2026-1149 being exploited in the wild?

Public exploitation has not been confirmed by CISA at the time of writing. Treat the patch as time-sensitive anyway; reports often lag actual abuse.

Will a WAF or IDS rule fully mitigate CVE-2026-1149?

No. Network-layer filters can reduce noise and slow opportunistic scanners, but they will not stop a determined attacker. The vendor patch is the only durable fix.

Do I need to assume compromise if my LR350 was internet-facing and unpatched?

For an unauthenticated RCE-class flaw exposed to the public internet during the known exploitation window, yes. Review logs, rotate credentials the process could access, and look for unexpected accounts, scheduled tasks, or outbound connections.

References

*This guide was assembled from the official vendor advisory, the NVD record, and the CISA KEV catalog entry on 2026-05-25. Always confirm against the vendor advisory before applying changes in production.*