How to Fix CVE-2026-1626: Broken cryptography in SICK LMS1000
By Sai Kiran Pandrala. Last verified: 2026-05-25.
CVE-2026-1626 is a broken cryptography in SICK AG SICK LMS1000. The fix is to apply the vendor patch noted below.
| Severity | 6.5 (Medium) |
|---|---|
| Actively exploited? | No public listing in CISA KEV |
| Affected | SICK LMS1000 0 to <=<=2.4.0; SICK MRS1000 0 to <=<=2.4.0 |
| Fixed in | See vendor advisory |
| Type (CWE) | CWE-327 Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm |
What is CVE-2026-1626?
An attacker may exploit the use of weak CBC-based cipher suites in the device’s SSH service to potentially observe or manipulate parts of the encrypted SSH communication, if they are able to intercept or interact with the network traffic. The CVSS base score is 6.5 (Medium). The official advisory is at https://www.sick.com/.well-known/csaf/white/2026/sca-2026-0005.pdf.
Am I affected?
Check the version of SICK LMS1000 you are running and compare it against the Affected row above (SICK LMS1000 0 to <=<=2.4.0; SICK MRS1000 0 to <=<=2.4.0). If your build sits inside the affected range, you must patch.
Run the version check that fits your platform:
# Linux package check
dpkg -s sick-lms1000 2>/dev/null | grep -i ^Version
rpm -q sick-lms1000 2>/dev/null
command -v sick-lms1000 >/dev/null && sick-lms1000 --version 2>/dev/null
# Windows (PowerShell)
Get-Package -Name "*SICK LMS1000*" -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue | Select-Object Name, Version
winget list --name "SICK LMS1000" 2>$null
How to fix CVE-2026-1626
Upgrade SICK LMS1000 to a patched build: See vendor advisory. The vendor advisory is the source of truth for the exact fixed version.
Ubuntu / Debian
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install --only-upgrade sick-lms1000
dpkg -s sick-lms1000 | grep -i ^Version
RHEL / CentOS / Rocky / AlmaLinux
sudo dnf upgrade --refresh sick-lms1000 -y
# or for older releases:
sudo yum update sick-lms1000 -y
rpm -q sick-lms1000
SUSE / openSUSE
sudo zypper refresh
sudo zypper update sick-lms1000
rpm -q sick-lms1000
Complete PowerShell remediation script (Windows)
# Fix script for CVE-2026-1626 affecting SICK LMS1000
# Run as administrator. Detect -> backup -> upgrade -> verify -> log.
$ErrorActionPreference = "Stop"
$LogPath = "C:\Logs\CVE-2026-1626-fix-$(Get-Date -Format yyyyMMdd-HHmmss).log"
New-Item -ItemType Directory -Force (Split-Path $LogPath) | Out-Null
Start-Transcript -Path $LogPath -Append
try {
Write-Host "[1/4] Detect installed version"
$pkg = Get-Package -Name "*SICK LMS1000*" -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue
if ($pkg) { $pkg | Format-Table Name, Version }
else { Write-Host "Not detected via Get-Package; try winget list" }
Write-Host "[2/4] Backup configuration"
$backup = "C:\Backup\sick-lms1000-$(Get-Date -Format yyyyMMdd)"
New-Item -ItemType Directory -Force $backup | Out-Null
Get-ChildItem "C:\ProgramData\SICK LMS1000" -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue |
Copy-Item -Destination $backup -Recurse -Force -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue
Write-Host "[3/4] Apply the upgrade to See vendor advisory"
winget upgrade --name "SICK LMS1000" --silent --accept-source-agreements --accept-package-agreements
if ($LASTEXITCODE -ne 0) {
# Fallback: pull latest via OS update channel
Install-Module -Name PSWindowsUpdate -Force -SkipPublisherCheck -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue
Import-Module PSWindowsUpdate
Install-WindowsUpdate -MicrosoftUpdate -AcceptAll -IgnoreReboot
}
Write-Host "[4/4] Verify the patched build"
winget list --name "SICK LMS1000"
Write-Host "Patch applied. Reboot if prompted."
exit 0
} catch {
Write-Error "Patch failed: $_"
exit 1
} finally {
Stop-Transcript
}
Complete Bash remediation script (Linux)
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# Fix script for CVE-2026-1626 affecting SICK LMS1000
# Detect -> backup -> upgrade -> verify -> log.
set -euo pipefail
LOG="/var/log/cve-2026-1626-fix-$(date +%Y%m%d-%H%M%S).log"
exec > >(tee -a "$LOG") 2>&1
echo "[1/4] Detect installed version"
if command -v dpkg >/dev/null; then
dpkg -s sick-lms1000 2>/dev/null | grep -i ^Version || echo "sick-lms1000 not installed via dpkg"
elif command -v rpm >/dev/null; then
rpm -q sick-lms1000 || echo "sick-lms1000 not installed via rpm"
fi
echo "[2/4] Backup configuration"
BACKUP="/root/backup-cve-2026-1626-$(date +%Y%m%d)"
mkdir -p "$BACKUP"
for d in /etc/sick-lms1000 /etc/sick-lms1000.d /etc/sick-lms1000.conf; do
[ -e "$d" ] && cp -a "$d" "$BACKUP/" || true
done
echo "[3/4] Apply the upgrade (target: See vendor advisory)"
if command -v apt-get >/dev/null; then
apt-get update
apt-get install --only-upgrade -y sick-lms1000
elif command -v dnf >/dev/null; then
dnf upgrade --refresh -y sick-lms1000
elif command -v yum >/dev/null; then
yum update -y sick-lms1000
elif command -v zypper >/dev/null; then
zypper --non-interactive update sick-lms1000
fi
echo "[4/4] Verify the patched build"
if command -v dpkg >/dev/null; then
dpkg -s sick-lms1000 2>/dev/null | grep -i ^Version
elif command -v rpm >/dev/null; then
rpm -q sick-lms1000
fi
echo "Done. Restart any service that loaded the old library."
If you can't patch immediately
Apply at least one of the following inline controls until you can deploy the patched build. None replace the upgrade.
Restrict exposure with nftables (Linux)
# Allow only trusted CIDR to reach the affected service ports
sudo nft add table inet filter 2>/dev/null || true
sudo nft 'add chain inet filter input { type filter hook input priority 0 ; }' 2>/dev/null || true
sudo nft 'add rule inet filter input tcp dport {80, 443} ip saddr != 10.0.0.0/8 drop'
sudo nft list ruleset
Block at the host firewall (Windows)
New-NetFirewallRule -DisplayName "Block-CVE-2026-1626" -Direction Inbound -Action Block -Protocol TCP -LocalPort 80,443 -RemoteAddress Any -Enabled True
Get-NetFirewallRule -DisplayName "Block-CVE-2026-1626"
Disable the affected service (Linux)
sudo systemctl stop sick-lms1000 2>/dev/null || true
sudo systemctl disable sick-lms1000 2>/dev/null || true
If the vendor advisory lists an official workaround, prefer that wording verbatim. If no workaround is published, the only safe remediation is the patch.
How to verify the fix worked
After upgrading, confirm the installed version matches the patched build and that no old library is still loaded by a long-running process.
# Linux
dpkg -s sick-lms1000 2>/dev/null | grep -i ^Version
rpm -q sick-lms1000 2>/dev/null || true
# Pid map check for old library handles
sudo lsof +c0 2>/dev/null | grep -i "DEL.*lib" || true
# Windows
Get-Package -Name "*SICK LMS1000*" | Select-Object Name, Version
Get-HotFix | Sort-Object InstalledOn -Descending | Select-Object -First 5
Expected: the reported version is at or above See vendor advisory. Restart the affected service (systemctl restart <service> on Linux, or restart the Windows service) so it loads the patched binary.
Frequently asked questions
Related fixes
Other vulnerabilities in the same area that are worth patching alongside this one:
- How to Fix CVE-2026-31889: Shopware has a potential take over of app credentials in core — Shopware has a potential take over of app credentials in core
- How to Fix CVE-2026-45386: Insecure Direct Object Reference in open-webui — Insecure Direct Object Reference in open-webui
- How to Fix CVE-2026-4163: Wavlink WL-WN579A3 POST Request wireless.cgi GuestWifi command injection , Wavlink WL-WN579A3 POST Request wireless.cgi GuestWifi command injection
- How to Fix CVE-2026-22870: Critical Vulnerability in guarddog , Critical Vulnerability in guarddog
- How to Fix CVE-2026-5587: wbbeyourself MAC-SQL Refiner Agent agents.py _execute_sql sql injection , wbbeyourself MAC-SQL Refiner Agent agents.py _execute_sql sql injection
Is CVE-2026-1626 actively exploited?
There is no public confirmation of exploitation in the wild listed in CISA KEV at the time of this writing. Patch anyway. Public exploits commonly follow disclosure within weeks.
Do I need to reboot after patching CVE-2026-1626?
For kernel and OS-level updates, yes. For most userland packages a systemctl restart <service> is enough on Linux, and restarting the Windows service or app on Windows. Any process that loaded the old library keeps using it until restarted.
What is the CVSS score for CVE-2026-1626?
6.5 (Medium). Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N.
Where is the official advisory for CVE-2026-1626?
The vendor advisory is at https://www.sick.com/.well-known/csaf/white/2026/sca-2026-0005.pdf. The NVD record is at https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-1626.
References
- Official vendor advisory: https://www.sick.com/.well-known/csaf/white/2026/sca-2026-0005.pdf
- NVD: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-1626
- CISA KEV catalog: https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog
- Additional reference: https://sick.com/psirt
- Additional reference: https://www.sick.com/media/docs/9/19/719/special_information_sick_operating_guidelines_cybersecurity_by_sick_en_im0106719.pdf
- Additional reference: https://www.cisa.gov/resources-tools/resources/ics-recommended-practices
*Written by Sai Kiran Pandrala. Assembled from the official vendor advisory, NVD record, and CISA KEV listing on 2026-05-25. Always confirm against the vendor's advisory before applying changes in production.*