⚠ Reference material — not professional advice. Test in staging, back up first, verify against your specific version. Use your own judgment for your environment.
● High · CVSS 8.2

How to Fix CVE-2026-24400: XXE Vulnerability in assertj

Other vulnerabilities in the same area that are worth patching alongside this one:

*By Sai Kiran Pandrala*

⚡ At a glance
SeverityCVSS 8.2 - High
Actively exploited?Not currently listed in CISA KEV
Affected>= 1.4.0, < 3.27.7
Fixed inSee vendor advisory
Type (CWE)CWE-611: Improper Restriction of XML External Entity Reference

What is CVE-2026-24400?

CVE-2026-24400 is an XML external entity (XXE) flaw in assertj. The XML parser resolves external entities, which lets an attacker read files on the server or trigger server-side requests. Vendor description: AssertJ provides Fluent testing assertions for Java and the Java Virtual Machine (JVM). Starting in version 1.4.0 and prior to version 3.27.7, an XML External Entity (XXE) vulnerability exists in org.assertj.core.util.xml.XmlStringPrettyFormatter: the toXmlDocument(String) method initializes DocumentBuilderFactory with default settings, without disabling DTDs or external entities.

Why this CVE matters

XXE vulnerabilities convert a simple XML parsing endpoint into a file-read and server-side request forgery primitive. The chained impact is often cloud-metadata theft or internal service enumeration from inside the target's network.

For deployments of assertj that have been exposed to the public internet during the disclosure window, the operating assumption should be that scanning has already happened. Even where exploitation has not been publicly observed, scanning for the vulnerable fingerprint is cheap and routine. Patching closes the door; log review and credential rotation close out the rest of the response.

Am I affected?

You are affected if your installation matches any of these version ranges:

Check your installed version against the list above. If you cannot determine the version, treat the system as affected and follow the upgrade path below.

Open assertj's About dialog or run the vendor-documented version-check command. Compare the result against the affected ranges in the advisory.

How to fix CVE-2026-24400

  1. Read the vendor advisory in full: https://github.com/assertj/assertj/security/advisories/GHSA-rqfh-9r24-8c9r
  2. Upgrade assertj to the patched build listed in the vendor advisory.
  3. Back up the configuration (and database, where applicable) before upgrading.
  4. Apply the patch in a maintenance window. For HA pairs, upgrade the standby node first, fail over, then upgrade the former primary.
  5. Restart the affected service so the patched binary loads, then verify the new version (see verification section).

Patch via the OS package manager


# Target fixed version: see advisory (https://github.com/assertj/assertj/security/advisories/GHSA-rqfh-9r24-8c9r)
# Source advisory: https://github.com/assertj/assertj/security/advisories/GHSA-rqfh-9r24-8c9r

# Debian / Ubuntu.
sudo apt update
sudo apt install --only-upgrade openjdk-17-jdk
dpkg -s openjdk-17-jdk | grep -i version

# RHEL / Rocky / AlmaLinux / Fedora.
sudo dnf upgrade --refresh openjdk-17-jdk -y
rpm -q openjdk-17-jdk

# openSUSE.
sudo zypper refresh
sudo zypper update openjdk-17-jdk

# Restart any service backed by this package, then confirm the running version.
sudo systemctl restart openjdk-17-jdk 2>/dev/null || true


# Vendor advisory: https://github.com/assertj/assertj/security/advisories/GHSA-rqfh-9r24-8c9r
# Container image refresh.
docker pull <your-registry>/openjdk-17-jdk:<patched-tag>
docker stop <your-app> && docker rm <your-app>
docker run -d --name <your-app> <your-registry>/openjdk-17-jdk:<patched-tag>


# Windows side of the fleet - install equivalent vendor update.
Install-Module PSWindowsUpdate -Force -SkipPublisherCheck -Confirm:$false
Import-Module PSWindowsUpdate
Get-WindowsUpdate -AcceptAll -Install -AutoReboot

Verify the fix landed


# 1. Confirm the running version matches the fixed-in version listed above.
# 2. Re-scan with your vulnerability scanner (Nessus, Qualys, Tenable, OpenVAS).
#    The scanner should no longer flag this CVE on the patched target.
# 3. Inspect recent service / kernel logs for crash-loops or rollback events.
journalctl --since "10 minutes ago" | tail -50
dmesg --since "10 minutes ago" 2>/dev/null | tail -50

If you cannot patch immediately

Disable XML external entity processing in the affected component if the vendor documents a configuration toggle. Otherwise, patch.

How to verify the fix worked

If your installation was internet-reachable during the disclosure window, treat log review as part of the remediation rather than an optional follow-up. Look for unusually long URI paths containing traversal sequences, unexpectedly large responses from the affected endpoint, and outbound requests from the application to internal addresses or cloud-metadata endpoints. Treat any sensitive file the bug could disclose as exposed.

Frequently asked questions

Is CVE-2026-24400 being exploited in the wild?

Public exploitation has not been confirmed by CISA at the time of writing. Treat the patch as time-sensitive anyway; reports often lag actual abuse.

Will a WAF or IDS rule fully mitigate CVE-2026-24400?

No. Network-layer filters can reduce noise and slow opportunistic scanners, but they will not stop a determined attacker. The vendor patch is the only durable fix.

How long should I plan for the upgrade?

Typical vendor-documented upgrade windows for assertj run from a few minutes to under an hour depending on cluster size. Test in a staging environment first and follow the vendor's documented HA upgrade order.

References

*This guide was assembled from the official vendor advisory, the NVD record, and the CISA KEV catalog entry on 2026-05-25. Always confirm against the vendor advisory before applying changes in production.*