How to Fix CVE-2026-24749: Incorrect authorization in silverstripe-assets
By Sai Kiran Pandrala. Last verified: 2026-05-25.
| Severity | 5.3 (Medium) |
|---|---|
| Actively exploited? | No public listing in CISA KEV |
| Affected | silverstripe < 2.4.5, >= 3.0.0-rc1, < 3.1.3 |
| Fixed in | silverstripe-assets 2.4.5; silverstripe-assets 3.1.3 |
| Type (CWE) | CWE-863: CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization |
What is CVE-2026-24749?
The Silverstripe Assets Module is a required component of Silverstripe Framework. In versions prior to 2.4.5 and 3.0.0-rc1 through 3.1.2, images rendered in templates or otherwise accessed via DBFile::getURL() or DBFile::getSourceURL() incorrectly add an access grant to the current session, which bypasses file permissions. This usually happens when creating an image variant, for example using a manipulation method like ScaleWidth() or Convert(). Note that if developers use DBFile directly in the $db configuration for a DataObject class that doesn't subclass File, and if they were setting the visibility of those files to "protected", those files will now need an explicit access grant to be accessed.
Am I affected?
Run the version check that matches your platform:
# Linux
dpkg -s silverstripe 2>/dev/null | grep -i version
rpm -q silverstripe 2>/dev/null
silverstripe --version 2>/dev/null
Compare what you see against the Affected row above (silverstripe < 2.4.5, >= 3.0.0-rc1, < 3.1.3). If your build sits inside that range, you are exposed and should patch.
How to fix CVE-2026-24749
The primary fix is to upgrade silverstripe-assets to the patched build. Use the commands for your platform below; the patched versions listed in the vendor advisory are: silverstripe-assets 2.4.5; silverstripe-assets 3.1.3.
Ubuntu / Debian
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install --only-upgrade silverstripe
silverstripe --version 2>/dev/null || dpkg -s silverstripe | grep -i version
RHEL / CentOS / Rocky / AlmaLinux
sudo dnf upgrade --security silverstripe -y
rpm -q silverstripe
SUSE / openSUSE
sudo zypper patch --category security
rpm -q silverstripe
Complete PowerShell remediation script (Windows)
# Fix script for CVE-2026-24749 affecting silverstripe-assets
# Run as administrator. Detect -> backup -> upgrade -> verify -> log.
$ErrorActionPreference = "Stop"
$LogPath = "C:\Logs\CVE-2026-24749-fix-$(Get-Date -Format yyyyMMdd-HHmmss).log"
New-Item -ItemType Directory -Force (Split-Path $LogPath) | Out-Null
Start-Transcript -Path $LogPath -Append
try {
Write-Host "[1/4] Detecting installed version of silverstripe-assets"
$pkg = winget list --id "silverstripe_assets" 2>$null
Write-Host $pkg
Write-Host "[2/4] Backing up configuration"
$backup = "C:\Backup\silverstripe_assets-$(Get-Date -Format yyyyMMdd)"
New-Item -ItemType Directory -Force $backup | Out-Null
Get-ChildItem "C:\ProgramData\silverstripe_assets" -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue |
Copy-Item -Destination $backup -Recurse -Force -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue
Write-Host "[3/4] Applying upgrade to silverstripe-assets 2.4.5; silverstripe-assets 3.1.3"
winget upgrade --id "silverstripe_assets" --silent --accept-source-agreements --accept-package-agreements
# Fallback: Windows Update for OS-level fixes
if ($LASTEXITCODE -ne 0) {
Install-Module -Name PSWindowsUpdate -Force -SkipPublisherCheck -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue
Import-Module PSWindowsUpdate
Install-WindowsUpdate -MicrosoftUpdate -AcceptAll -IgnoreReboot
}
Write-Host "[4/4] Verifying patched build"
winget list --id "silverstripe_assets"
Write-Host "Fix applied. Reboot if prompted."
exit 0
} catch {
Write-Error "Patch failed: $_"
exit 1
} finally {
Stop-Transcript
}
Complete Bash remediation script (Linux)
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# Fix script for CVE-2026-24749 affecting silverstripe-assets
# Detect -> backup -> upgrade -> verify -> log.
set -euo pipefail
LOG="/var/log/cve-2026-24749-fix-$(date +%Y%m%d-%H%M%S).log"
exec > >(tee -a "$LOG") 2>&1
echo "[1/4] Detecting installed version"
if command -v dpkg >/dev/null; then
dpkg -s silverstripe 2>/dev/null | grep -i version || echo "silverstripe not installed via dpkg"
elif command -v rpm >/dev/null; then
rpm -q silverstripe || echo "silverstripe not installed via rpm"
fi
echo "[2/4] Backing up configuration"
BACKUP="/root/backup-cve-2026-24749-$(date +%Y%m%d)"
mkdir -p "$BACKUP"
for d in /etc/silverstripe /etc/silverstripe.d /etc/silverstripe.conf; do
[ -e "$d" ] && cp -a "$d" "$BACKUP/" || true
done
echo "[3/4] Applying upgrade (target: silverstripe-assets 2.4.5; silverstripe-assets 3.1.3)"
if command -v apt-get >/dev/null; then
apt-get update
apt-get install --only-upgrade -y silverstripe
elif command -v dnf >/dev/null; then
dnf upgrade --security -y silverstripe
elif command -v yum >/dev/null; then
yum update -y silverstripe
elif command -v zypper >/dev/null; then
zypper --non-interactive patch --category security
fi
echo "[4/4] Verifying patched build"
if command -v dpkg >/dev/null; then
dpkg -s silverstripe 2>/dev/null | grep -i version
elif command -v rpm >/dev/null; then
rpm -q silverstripe
fi
echo "Done. Restart any running daemons that loaded the old library."
If you can't patch immediately
If you cannot apply the patched version today, restrict exposure with one of the following runnable controls. None replace the patch.
Network restriction (Linux, nftables)
# Block inbound traffic to the affected service from untrusted networks
sudo nft add table inet filter
sudo nft 'add chain inet filter input { type filter hook input priority 0 ; }'
sudo nft 'add rule inet filter input tcp dport {443, 80} ip saddr != 10.0.0.0/8 drop'
sudo nft list ruleset
Service-level fallback
# If the affected feature is optional, stop the service until the patch is applied
sudo systemctl stop silverstripe
sudo systemctl disable silverstripe
How to verify the fix worked
# Linux
silverstripe --version 2>/dev/null || dpkg -s silverstripe | grep -i version
rpm -q silverstripe 2>/dev/null || true
# Windows
winget list | findstr /I "silverstripe"
Get-HotFix | Sort-Object InstalledOn -Descending | Select-Object -First 5
Expected: the reported version is at or above silverstripe-assets 2.4.5; silverstripe-assets 3.1.3. Restart any services that loaded the old library (systemctl restart <service> on Linux, restart the Windows service or reboot when prompted). For network appliances, run show version on the device and confirm the build matches the patched release.
Frequently asked questions
Related fixes
Other vulnerabilities in the same area that are worth patching alongside this one:
- How to Fix CVE-2026-33474: Critical Vulnerability in vikunja — Critical Vulnerability in vikunja
- How to Fix CVE-2026-25110: Denial of Service in OpenHarmony — Denial of Service in OpenHarmony
- How to Fix CVE-2026-39326: CRM (Bundle Sibling) , CRM (Bundle Sibling)
- How to Fix CVE-2026-34084: Deserialization of Untrusted Data in PhpSpreadsheet , Deserialization of Untrusted Data in PhpSpreadsheet
- How to Fix CVE-2026-34956: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') , Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow')
Is CVE-2026-24749 actually being exploited?
According to the data sources above, no public confirmation of in-the-wild exploitation at this time. Either way, the fix is the same: apply the vendor patch.
Do I need to reboot after patching?
For OS or kernel updates, yes. For most userland packages a systemctl restart <service> is enough. Any process that loaded the old shared library keeps using it until restarted, so when in doubt, reboot.
What is the CVSS score?
5.3 (medium). Refer to the vendor advisory for the exact vector string.
Where is the official advisory?
See the References section at the bottom of this page; the vendor's URL is the authoritative source for affected builds and patched versions.
References
- Official vendor advisory: https://github.com/silverstripe/silverstripe-assets/security/advisories/GHSA-jgcf-rf45-2f8v
- NVD: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-24749
- https://www.silverstripe.org/download/security-releases/cve-2026-24749
*Written by Sai Kiran Pandrala. Assembled from the official vendor advisory, NVD record, and CISA KEV listing on 2026-05-25. Always confirm against the vendor's advisory before applying changes in production.*