⚠ Reference material — not professional advice. Test in staging, back up first, verify against your specific version. Use your own judgment for your environment.
● Medium · CVSS 5.1

How to Fix CVE-2026-25088: SQL Injection in FortiNDR

Other vulnerabilities in the same area that are worth patching alongside this one:

*By Sai Kiran Pandrala*

⚡ At a glance
SeverityCVSS 5.1 - Medium
Actively exploited?Not currently listed in CISA KEV
Affected7.6.0 <= 7.6.2, 7.4.0 <= 7.4.9, 7.2.0 <= 7.2.5, 7.1.0 <= 7.1.1, 7.0.0 <= 7.0.7
Fixed inSee vendor advisory
Type (CWE)CWE-89: Execute unauthorized code or commands

What is CVE-2026-25088?

CVE-2026-25088 is a SQL injection flaw in FortiNDR. User input reaches a database query without proper parameterization, letting an attacker read, modify, or in some cases execute commands through stacked queries or out-of-band channels. Vendor description: An improper neutralization of special elements used in an sql command ('sql injection') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiNDR 7.6.0 through 7.6.2, FortiNDR 7.4.0 through 7.4.9, FortiNDR 7.2 all versions, FortiNDR 7.1 all versions, FortiNDR 7.0 all versions may allow an authenticated attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via specifically crafted HTTP requests.

Why this CVE matters

SQL injection against a management product is rarely just a data leak. Once an attacker can read or write to the application database, the chain commonly ends with credential theft, persistence via scheduled tasks, or stacked queries that pivot into the operating system.

For deployments of FortiNDR that have been exposed to the public internet during the disclosure window, the operating assumption should be that scanning has already happened. Even where exploitation has not been publicly observed, scanning for the vulnerable fingerprint is cheap and routine. Patching closes the door; log review and credential rotation close out the rest of the response.

Am I affected?

You are affected if your installation matches any of these version ranges:

Check your installed version against the list above. If you cannot determine the version, treat the system as affected and follow the upgrade path below.

On FortiGate / FortiOS systems, run get system status from the CLI and compare the Version line against the affected ranges above.

How to fix CVE-2026-25088

  1. Read the vendor advisory in full: https://fortiguard.fortinet.com/psirt/FG-IR-26-134
  2. Upgrade FortiNDR to the patched build listed in the vendor advisory.
  3. Back up the configuration (and database, where applicable) before upgrading.
  4. Rotate any credentials, API keys, or session tokens that the vulnerable service touched. An unauthenticated RCE-class flaw means anything the process could see should be treated as exposed.
  5. Apply the patch in a maintenance window. For HA pairs, upgrade the standby node first, fail over, then upgrade the former primary.
  6. Restart the affected service so the patched binary loads, then verify the new version (see verification section).

Patched-version commands

Vendor advisory: https://fortiguard.fortinet.com/psirt/FG-IR-26-134

Affected: FortiNDR: 7.6.0 <= 7.6.2

Patched in: 7.6.2


# Vendor advisory: https://fortiguard.fortinet.com/psirt/FG-IR-26-134
# Verify the running build.
get system status | grep -i version

# Upload the patched image (FortiOS .out) via TFTP.
execute restore image tftp fortindr-7.6.2.out 10.0.0.10

# After auto-reboot, re-check the version string.
get system status | grep -i version


# Fleet check via FortiManager REST API.
$Headers = @{ "Authorization" = "Bearer $env:FMG_TOKEN" }
Invoke-RestMethod -Uri "https://<fmg>/api/v2/monitor/system/status" -Headers $Headers |
  Select-Object -ExpandProperty results | Select-Object hostname, version, build

Verify the fix landed


# Vendor advisory: https://fortiguard.fortinet.com/psirt/FG-IR-26-134
# Post-patch verification (replace <service> with the real service unit).
journalctl -u <service> --since "10 minutes ago"
dmesg --since "10 minutes ago"

# Re-scan with your vulnerability scanner (Nessus, Qualys, Tenable, OpenVAS).
# It should no longer flag CVE-2026-25088 on the patched target.

If you cannot patch immediately

Front the affected endpoint with a WAF rule that blocks SQL metacharacters in the vulnerable parameters. This is a stopgap, not a fix. Patch promptly.

How to verify the fix worked

If your installation was internet-reachable during the disclosure window, treat log review as part of the remediation rather than an optional follow-up. Look for unexpected administrator accounts in FortiNDR, scheduled tasks or cron jobs you did not create, new files in web-accessible directories, and outbound connections to addresses not in your baseline. Suspicious requests to the vulnerable endpoint immediately followed by successful 200-class responses with unusually large bodies are a strong indicator of exploitation.

Frequently asked questions

Is CVE-2026-25088 being exploited in the wild?

Public exploitation has not been confirmed by CISA at the time of writing. Treat the patch as time-sensitive anyway; reports often lag actual abuse.

Will a WAF or IDS rule fully mitigate CVE-2026-25088?

No. Network-layer filters can reduce noise and slow opportunistic scanners, but they will not stop a determined attacker. The vendor patch is the only durable fix.

Do I need to assume compromise if my FortiNDR was internet-facing and unpatched?

For an unauthenticated RCE-class flaw exposed to the public internet during the known exploitation window, yes. Review logs, rotate credentials the process could access, and look for unexpected accounts, scheduled tasks, or outbound connections.

References

*This guide was assembled from the official vendor advisory, the NVD record, and the CISA KEV catalog entry on 2026-05-25. Always confirm against the vendor advisory before applying changes in production.*