How to Fix CVE-2026-25517: Critical Vulnerability in wagtail
Related fixes
Other vulnerabilities in the same area that are worth patching alongside this one:
- How to Fix CVE-2026-2560: Command Injection in kodbox — Command Injection in kodbox
- How to Fix CVE-2026-0848: Improper input validation in nltk/nltk — Improper input validation in nltk/nltk
- How to Fix CVE-2026-22420: Improper control of filename for include/require statement in php program ('php. , Improper control of filename for include/require statement in php program ('php.
- How to Fix CVE-2026-27993: Improper control of filename for include/require statement in php program ('php. , Improper control of filename for include/require statement in php program ('php.
- How to Fix CVE-2026-32532: Critical Vulnerability in Contact Form & Lead Form Elementor Builder , Critical Vulnerability in Contact Form & Lead Form Elementor Builder
*By Sai Kiran Pandrala*
| Severity | CVSS 5.1 - Medium |
|---|---|
| Actively exploited? | Not currently listed in CISA KEV |
| Affected | < 6.3.6, >= 6.4rc1, < 7.0.4, >= 7.1rc1, < 7.1.3, >= 7.2rc1, < 7.2.2, = 7.3rc1 |
| Fixed in | versions |
| Type (CWE) | CWE-862: Missing Authorization |
What is CVE-2026-25517?
CVE-2026-25517 is a security flaw in wagtail. Wagtail is an open source content management system built on Django. Prior to versions 6.3.6, 7.0.4, 7.1.3, 7.2.2, and 7.3, due to a missing permission check on the preview endpoints, a user with access to the Wagtail admin and knowledge of a model's fields can craft a form submission to obtain a preview rendering of any page, snippet or site setting object for which previews are enabled, consisting of any data of the user's choosing.
Why this CVE matters
Unpatched network-facing software is the leading initial-access vector in public breach reporting. Treat any CVSS-9 class flaw on an internet-reachable system as urgent, regardless of whether public exploit code has been observed yet.
For deployments of wagtail that have been exposed to the public internet during the disclosure window, the operating assumption should be that scanning has already happened. Even where exploitation has not been publicly observed, scanning for the vulnerable fingerprint is cheap and routine. Patching closes the door; log review and credential rotation close out the rest of the response.
Am I affected?
You are affected if your installation matches any of these version ranges:
- wagtail: < 6.3.6
- wagtail: >= 6.4rc1, < 7.0.4
- wagtail: >= 7.1rc1, < 7.1.3
- wagtail: >= 7.2rc1, < 7.2.2
- wagtail: = 7.3rc1
Check your installed version against the list above. If you cannot determine the version, treat the system as affected and follow the upgrade path below.
Open wagtail's About dialog or run the vendor-documented version-check command. Compare the result against the affected ranges in the advisory.
How to fix CVE-2026-25517
- Read the vendor advisory in full: https://github.com/wagtail/wagtail/security/advisories/GHSA-4qvv-g3vr-m348
- Upgrade wagtail to the patched build listed in the vendor advisory.
- Back up the configuration (and database, where applicable) before upgrading.
- Apply the patch in a maintenance window. For HA pairs, upgrade the standby node first, fail over, then upgrade the former primary.
- Restart the affected service so the patched binary loads, then verify the new version (see verification section).
Patched-version commands
Vendor advisory: https://github.com/wagtail/wagtail/security/advisories/GHSA-4qvv-g3vr-m348
Affected: wagtail: < 6.3.6
Patched in: <patched-version-from-advisory>
# Vendor advisory: https://github.com/wagtail/wagtail/security/advisories/GHSA-4qvv-g3vr-m348
# Patch in-place.
python -m pip install --upgrade "wagtail>=<patched-version-from-advisory>"
# Pin in requirements.txt and re-sync for reproducible builds.
sed -i 's/^wagtail==.*/wagtail==<patched-version-from-advisory>/' requirements.txt
python -m pip install -r requirements.txt
# Verify.
python -m pip show wagtail | grep -i version
# Vendor advisory: https://github.com/wagtail/wagtail/security/advisories/GHSA-4qvv-g3vr-m348
# Same flow on Windows.
python -m pip install --upgrade "wagtail>=<patched-version-from-advisory>"
python -m pip show wagtail
Verify the fix landed
# Vendor advisory: https://github.com/wagtail/wagtail/security/advisories/GHSA-4qvv-g3vr-m348
# Post-patch verification (replace <service> with the real service unit).
journalctl -u <service> --since "10 minutes ago"
dmesg --since "10 minutes ago"
# Re-scan with your vulnerability scanner (Nessus, Qualys, Tenable, OpenVAS).
# It should no longer flag CVE-2026-25517 on the patched target.
If you cannot patch immediately
No official workaround exists beyond restricting network exposure to the affected component. Apply the vendor patch as the primary remediation.
How to verify the fix worked
- After applying the patch, verify the running version in the product's admin UI or via the vendor-documented CLI command.
- Confirm the patched build matches the version listed in the vendor advisory.
- Run an authenticated vulnerability scan with a current signature set and confirm the scanner no longer flags CVE-2026-25517.
- Review logs for the entire pre-patch window for indicators of compromise listed in the vendor or CISA advisory.
- Confirm any network-layer mitigations that were applied as a stopgap have been reverted (or left in place intentionally) once the patch is verified.
If your installation was internet-reachable during the disclosure window, treat log review as part of the remediation rather than an optional follow-up. Look for log entries that do not match your normal request patterns, especially repeated requests to the same uncommon endpoint, and any administrative changes you cannot tie back to a known operator.
Frequently asked questions
Is CVE-2026-25517 being exploited in the wild?
Public exploitation has not been confirmed by CISA at the time of writing. Treat the patch as time-sensitive anyway; reports often lag actual abuse.
Will a WAF or IDS rule fully mitigate CVE-2026-25517?
No. Network-layer filters can reduce noise and slow opportunistic scanners, but they will not stop a determined attacker. The vendor patch is the only durable fix.
How long should I plan for the upgrade?
Typical vendor-documented upgrade windows for wagtail run from a few minutes to under an hour depending on cluster size. Test in a staging environment first and follow the vendor's documented HA upgrade order.
References
- Official vendor advisory: https://github.com/wagtail/wagtail/security/advisories/GHSA-4qvv-g3vr-m348
- NVD entry: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-25517
- CISA KEV catalog: https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog
- Additional vendor or research reference: https://github.com/wagtail/wagtail/commit/01fd3477365a193e6a8270311defb76e890d2719
- Additional vendor or research reference: https://github.com/wagtail/wagtail/commit/5f09b6da61e779b0e8499bdbba52bf2f7bd3241f
- Additional vendor or research reference: https://github.com/wagtail/wagtail/commit/73f070dbefbd3b39ea6649ce36bd2d2a6eef2190
- Additional vendor or research reference: https://github.com/wagtail/wagtail/commit/7dfe8de5f8b3f112c73c87b6729197db16454915
*This guide was assembled from the official vendor advisory, the NVD record, and the CISA KEV catalog entry on 2026-05-25. Always confirm against the vendor advisory before applying changes in production.*