Reference material — not professional advice. Test in staging, back up first, verify against your specific version. Use your own judgment for your environment.
● Not verified

How to Fix CVE-2026-31455: xfs: stop reclaim before pushing AIL during unmount in Linux

By Sai Kiran Pandrala

Other vulnerabilities in the same area that are worth patching alongside this one:

Last verified: 2026-05-25

CVE-2026-31455 is a xfs: stop reclaim before pushing ail during unmount in Linux Linux. Fix it by upgrading to 5.10.253, 5.15.203, 6.1.168, 6.6.131, 6.12.80, 6.18.21.

⚡ At a glance
SeverityNot verified - see official advisory
Actively exploited?Not currently in the CISA KEV catalog
AffectedLinux 90c60e16401248a4900f3f9387f563d0178dcf34 up to (excluding) e6cc490048f78b009259a5f032acead9f789c34c; Linux 90c60e16401248a4900f3f9387f563d0178dcf34 up to (excluding) 239d734c00644072862fa833805c4471573b1445; Linux 90c60e16401248a4900f3f9387f563d0178dcf34 up to (excluding) bda27fc0b4eb3a425d9a18475c4cb94fbe862c60; Linux 90c60e16401248a4900f3f9387f563d0178dcf34 up to (excluding) d38135af04a3ad8a585c899d176efc8e97853115; Linux 90c60e16401248a4900f3f9387f563d0178dcf34 up to (excluding) a89434a6188d8430ea31120da96e3e4cefb58686; Linux 90c60e16401248a4900f3f9387f563d0178dcf34 up to (excluding) 8147e304d7d32fd5c3e943babc296ce2873dc279
Fixed in5.10.253, 5.15.203, 6.1.168, 6.6.131, 6.12.80, 6.18.21
Type (CWE)Not verified

What is CVE-2026-31455?

CVE-2026-31455 is a xfs: stop reclaim before pushing ail during unmount flaw in Linux Linux. The vendor has not published a verified CVSS metric at the time of writing. It is not currently listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.

From the source record: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

xfs: stop reclaim before pushing AIL during unmount

The unmount sequence in xfs_unmount_flush_inodes() pushed the AIL while

background reclaim and inodegc are still running. This is broken

independently of any use-after-free issues - background reclaim and

inodegc should not be running while the AIL is being pushed during

unmount, as inodegc can dirty and insert inodes into the AIL during the

flush, and background reclaim can race to abort and free dirty inodes.

Reorder xfs_unmount_flush_inodes() to stop inodegc and cancel background

reclaim before pushing the AIL. Stop inodegc before cancelling

m_reclaim_work because the inodegc worker can re-queue m_reclaim_work

via xfs_inodegc_set_reclaimable.

Why it matters in practice: The blast radius depends on how the affected service is exposed. An internet-facing instance with no compensating controls is the highest-risk configuration.

Am I affected?

You are affected if your installation of Linux matches a version listed in the Affected row above.


# Debian/Ubuntu
dpkg -s linux | grep Version
# RHEL/Rocky
rpm -q linux

How to fix CVE-2026-31455

Apply the vendor patch. Target the build named in the Fixed in row above (5.10.253, 5.15.203, 6.1.168, 6.6.131, 6.12.80, 6.18.21). The runnable command set below covers the most common deployment patterns for Linux.

Ubuntu / Debian


sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install --only-upgrade linux
dpkg -s linux | grep Version

RHEL / CentOS / Rocky


sudo dnf upgrade linux -y
rpm -q linux

After applying the patch

  1. Restart the service or device so the patched binary loads.
  2. Confirm the running version matches the Fixed in row using the verification command below.
  3. Rotate credentials and API keys that the affected service could access if the asset was exposed during the disclosure window.

If you can't patch immediately

Until the patch lands, narrow the attack surface with these runnable controls.

Restrict network exposure

Block public access to the affected service at the perimeter. Allow only trusted source IPs.


# Linux iptables: only allow trusted admin subnet
sudo iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 443 -s 10.10.10.0/24 -j ACCEPT
sudo iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 443 -j DROP
sudo iptables-save | sudo tee /etc/iptables/rules.v4

# Windows firewall: only allow trusted admin subnet on management port
New-NetFirewallRule -DisplayName "Restrict-Mgmt-Allow" -Direction Inbound -Action Allow `
  -RemoteAddress 10.10.10.0/24 -Protocol TCP -LocalPort 443
New-NetFirewallRule -DisplayName "Restrict-Mgmt-Deny"  -Direction Inbound -Action Block `
  -Protocol TCP -LocalPort 443

Mitigations are temporary. Apply the vendor patch as soon as a maintenance window opens.

How to verify the fix worked

Confirm the patched build is the one actually running.


# Debian/Ubuntu
dpkg -s linux | grep Version
# RHEL/Rocky
rpm -q linux

Expected: a version at or above 5.10.253, 5.15.203, 6.1.168, 6.6.131, 6.12.80, 6.18.21.

Also worth doing: pull recent log windows for indicators of compromise listed in the vendor advisory, and re-run an authenticated vulnerability scan with up-to-date signatures.

Frequently asked questions

Is CVE-2026-31455 being exploited in the wild?

As of 2026-05-25, CVE-2026-31455 is not listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. Watch the catalog and patch on a normal cadence; KEV status can change as exploitation evidence emerges.

What is the CVSS score for CVE-2026-31455?

A verified CVSS score is not listed in the public record for CVE-2026-31455. Check the vendor advisory and the NVD page for an updated metric.

What version fixes this?

Upgrade to 5.10.253, 5.15.203, 6.1.168, 6.6.131, 6.12.80, 6.18.21.

Will a WAF or IDS rule alone close this?

No. Network filters cut down opportunistic scans but they do not remove the flaw. The vendor patch is the only durable fix.

References


*Assembled from the official vendor advisory, the NVD record, and the CISA KEV listing on 2026-05-25. Always confirm against the vendor advisory before applying changes in production.*