Reference material — not professional advice. Test in staging, back up first, verify against your specific version. Use your own judgment for your environment.
● Not verified

How to Fix CVE-2026-31750: comedi: runflags cannot determine whether to reclaim chanlist in Linux

By Sai Kiran Pandrala

Other vulnerabilities in the same area that are worth patching alongside this one:

Last verified: 2026-05-25

CVE-2026-31750 is a comedi: runflags cannot determine whether to reclaim chanlist in Linux Linux. Fix it by upgrading to 6.19.12, 7.0.

⚡ At a glance
SeverityNot verified - see official advisory
Actively exploited?Not currently in the CISA KEV catalog
AffectedLinux 4e1da516debbe6a573ffa0392e2809d180d0575c up to (excluding) 830c848aba9f047eb6b34288975ebeb8e8621451; Linux 4e1da516debbe6a573ffa0392e2809d180d0575c up to (excluding) 29f644f14b89e6c4965e3c89251929e451190a66; Linux 6.19
Fixed in6.19.12, 7.0
Type (CWE)Not verified

What is CVE-2026-31750?

CVE-2026-31750 is a comedi: runflags cannot determine whether to reclaim chanlist flaw in Linux Linux. The vendor has not published a verified CVSS metric at the time of writing. It is not currently listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.

From the source record: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

comedi: runflags cannot determine whether to reclaim chanlist

syzbot reported a memory leak [1], because commit 4e1da516debb ("comedi:

Add reference counting for Comedi command handling") did not consider

the exceptional exit case in do_cmd_ioctl() where runflags is not set.

This caused chanlist not to be properly freed by do_become_nonbusy(),

as it only frees chanlist when runflags is correctly set.

Added a check in do_become_nonbusy() for the case where runflags is not

set, to properly free the chanlist memory.

[1]

BUG: memory leak

backtrace (crc 844a0efa):

__comedi_get_user_chanlist drivers/comedi/comedi_fops.c:1815 [inline]

do_cmd_ioctl.part.0+0x112/0x350 drivers/comedi/comedi_fops.c:1890

do_cmd_ioctl drivers/comedi/comedi_fops.c:1858 [inline]

Why it matters in practice: The blast radius depends on how the affected service is exposed. An internet-facing instance with no compensating controls is the highest-risk configuration.

Am I affected?

You are affected if your installation of Linux matches a version listed in the Affected row above.


# Debian/Ubuntu
dpkg -s linux | grep Version
# RHEL/Rocky
rpm -q linux

How to fix CVE-2026-31750

Apply the vendor patch. Target the build named in the Fixed in row above (6.19.12, 7.0). The runnable command set below covers the most common deployment patterns for Linux.

Ubuntu / Debian


sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install --only-upgrade linux
dpkg -s linux | grep Version

RHEL / CentOS / Rocky


sudo dnf upgrade linux -y
rpm -q linux

After applying the patch

  1. Restart the service or device so the patched binary loads.
  2. Confirm the running version matches the Fixed in row using the verification command below.
  3. Rotate credentials and API keys that the affected service could access if the asset was exposed during the disclosure window.

If you can't patch immediately

Until the patch lands, narrow the attack surface with these runnable controls.

Restrict network exposure

Block public access to the affected service at the perimeter. Allow only trusted source IPs.


# Linux iptables: only allow trusted admin subnet
sudo iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 443 -s 10.10.10.0/24 -j ACCEPT
sudo iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 443 -j DROP
sudo iptables-save | sudo tee /etc/iptables/rules.v4

# Windows firewall: only allow trusted admin subnet on management port
New-NetFirewallRule -DisplayName "Restrict-Mgmt-Allow" -Direction Inbound -Action Allow `
  -RemoteAddress 10.10.10.0/24 -Protocol TCP -LocalPort 443
New-NetFirewallRule -DisplayName "Restrict-Mgmt-Deny"  -Direction Inbound -Action Block `
  -Protocol TCP -LocalPort 443

Mitigations are temporary. Apply the vendor patch as soon as a maintenance window opens.

How to verify the fix worked

Confirm the patched build is the one actually running.


# Debian/Ubuntu
dpkg -s linux | grep Version
# RHEL/Rocky
rpm -q linux

Expected: a version at or above 6.19.12, 7.0.

Also worth doing: pull recent log windows for indicators of compromise listed in the vendor advisory, and re-run an authenticated vulnerability scan with up-to-date signatures.

Frequently asked questions

Is CVE-2026-31750 being exploited in the wild?

As of 2026-05-25, CVE-2026-31750 is not listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. Watch the catalog and patch on a normal cadence; KEV status can change as exploitation evidence emerges.

What is the CVSS score for CVE-2026-31750?

A verified CVSS score is not listed in the public record for CVE-2026-31750. Check the vendor advisory and the NVD page for an updated metric.

What version fixes this?

Upgrade to 6.19.12, 7.0.

Will a WAF or IDS rule alone close this?

No. Network filters cut down opportunistic scans but they do not remove the flaw. The vendor patch is the only durable fix.

References


*Assembled from the official vendor advisory, the NVD record, and the CISA KEV listing on 2026-05-25. Always confirm against the vendor advisory before applying changes in production.*