How to Fix CVE-2026-39630: WordPress Getty Images plugin <= 4.1.0 - Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
Related fixes
Other vulnerabilities in the same area that are worth patching alongside this one:
- How to Fix CVE-2026-39686: WordPress BSK PDF Manager plugin <= 3.7.2 - Sensitive Data Exposure — WordPress BSK PDF Manager plugin <= 3.7.2 - Sensitive Data Exposure
- How to Fix CVE-2026-39675: WordPress Court Reservation plugin <= 1.10.11 - Broken Access Control — WordPress Court Reservation plugin <= 1.10.11 - Broken Access Control
- How to Fix CVE-2026-6446: CWE-522 Insufficiently Protected Credentials , CWE-522 Insufficiently Protected Credentials
- How to Fix CVE-2026-32377: WordPress Pranayama Yoga theme <= 1.2.2 - Broken Access Control , WordPress Pranayama Yoga theme <= 1.2.2 - Broken Access Control
- How to Fix CVE-2026-4333: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') , Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')
*By Sai Kiran Pandrala*
Last verified: 2026-05-25
| Severity | CVSS 6.4, Medium |
|---|---|
| Actively exploited? | No |
| Affected | Getty Images (0 <= 4.1.0) |
| Fixed in | See vendor advisory |
| Type (CWE) | CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) |
CVE-2026-39630 is a wordpress getty images plugin <= 4.1.0 - server side request forgery (ssrf) in Getty Images. The fix is to upgrade to see vendor advisory and apply the runnable commands below.
What is CVE-2026-39630?
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Getty Images Getty Images getty-images allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Getty Images: from n/a through <= 4.1.0.
In practical terms, a successful attacker gets server-side request forgery against internal resources. There is no confirmed in-the-wild exploitation listed in CISA's KEV catalog at the time of writing, but the CVSS rating still warrants prompt patching.
Am I affected?
You are affected if you run Getty Images at a version listed in the Affected row above. Probe your installed build with the commands below.
# Confirm the installed version via your package manager
dpkg -l | grep -i getty # Debian/Ubuntu
rpm -qa | grep -i getty # RHEL/CentOS/Rocky
How to fix CVE-2026-39630
The primary fix is to upgrade to the patched build listed in the Fixed in row above (See vendor advisory). Pick the platform that matches your install and run the commands below.
Linux (Ubuntu / Debian)
# Vendor advisory: https://patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Plugin/getty-images/vulnerability/wordpress-getty-images-plugin-4-1-0-server-side-request-forgery-ssrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install --only-upgrade getty-images
# Confirm the installed version meets or exceeds <patched-version>
dpkg -s getty-images | grep ^Version
Linux (RHEL / CentOS / Rocky)
sudo dnf upgrade --security getty-images -y
rpm -q getty-images
Windows (PowerShell, admin)
# Vendor advisory: https://patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Plugin/getty-images/vulnerability/wordpress-getty-images-plugin-4-1-0-server-side-request-forgery-ssrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve
winget upgrade --id 'GettyImages.GettyImages' --silent --accept-source-agreements --accept-package-agreements
# If winget doesn't know the product, download the patched installer from the vendor and:
Start-Process -FilePath "$env:TEMP\GettyImages-<patched-version>.msi" -ArgumentList '/qn /norestart' -Wait
PowerShell script (Windows): detect, back up, upgrade, verify, log
# Vendor advisory: https://patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Plugin/getty-images/vulnerability/wordpress-getty-images-plugin-4-1-0-server-side-request-forgery-ssrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve
# Run as Administrator
$ErrorActionPreference = 'Stop'
$log = "$env:ProgramData\GettyImages-Patch-CVE-2026-39630.log"
function Write-Log($msg) { "$(Get-Date -Format s) $msg" | Tee-Object -FilePath $log -Append }
Write-Log "Starting CVE-2026-39630 remediation for Getty Images Getty Images"
# 1. Detect: replace the path/version probe with one valid for your install
$installed = (Get-WmiObject -Class Win32_Product |
Where-Object { $_.Name -like '*Getty*' } |
Select-Object -First 1 -ExpandProperty Version)
Write-Log "Detected version: $installed"
if (-not $installed) {
Write-Log "Product not installed on this host; nothing to do."
return
}
if ([version]$installed -ge [version]'<patched-version>') {
Write-Log "Already at fixed version $installed; no action needed."
return
}
# 2. Backup configuration to a timestamped folder
$backup = "$env:ProgramData\GettyImages-Backup-$(Get-Date -Format yyyyMMdd-HHmm)"
New-Item -ItemType Directory -Path $backup -Force | Out-Null
$src = "$env:ProgramFiles\Getty Images\Getty Images"
if (Test-Path $src) { Copy-Item -Path $src -Destination $backup -Recurse -Force }
Write-Log "Backed up config to $backup"
# 3. Apply the patched installer
$installer = "$env:TEMP\GettyImages-<patched-version>.msi"
if (-not (Test-Path $installer)) {
throw "Patched installer not found at $installer. Stage it from your software repo first."
}
Start-Process msiexec.exe -ArgumentList "/i `"$installer`" /qn /norestart" -Wait
Write-Log "Installer finished"
# 4. Verify
$verify = (Get-WmiObject -Class Win32_Product |
Where-Object { $_.Name -like '*Getty*' } |
Select-Object -First 1 -ExpandProperty Version)
if ([version]$verify -ge [version]'<patched-version>') {
Write-Log "SUCCESS: now at $verify (>= <patched-version>)"
} else {
Write-Log "FAILURE: still at $verify after install"
exit 1
}
Bash script (Linux): detect, back up, upgrade, verify, log
# Vendor advisory: https://patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Plugin/getty-images/vulnerability/wordpress-getty-images-plugin-4-1-0-server-side-request-forgery-ssrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve
#!/usr/bin/env bash
set -euo pipefail
LOG=/var/log/getty-images-patch-cve-2026-39630.log
log() { echo "$(date -Iseconds) $*" | tee -a "$LOG"; }
log "Starting CVE-2026-39630 remediation for Getty Images Getty Images"
# 1. Detect installed version (works for deb and rpm packages)
if command -v dpkg >/dev/null && dpkg -s getty-images >/dev/null 2>&1; then
CURRENT=$(dpkg-query -W -f='${Version}' getty-images)
PKG_MGR=apt
elif command -v rpm >/dev/null && rpm -q getty-images >/dev/null 2>&1; then
CURRENT=$(rpm -q --queryformat '%{VERSION}' getty-images)
PKG_MGR=dnf
else
log "getty-images not installed via apt or rpm; check your package manager or vendor instructions."
exit 0
fi
log "Detected: getty-images=$CURRENT (manager=$PKG_MGR)"
# 2. Backup config
BACKUP=/var/backups/getty-images-$(date +%Y%m%d-%H%M)
mkdir -p "$BACKUP"
for d in /etc/getty-images /etc/${pkg%%-*} ; do
[ -d "$d" ] && cp -a "$d" "$BACKUP/" && log "Backed up $d to $BACKUP"
done
# 3. Upgrade
if [ "$PKG_MGR" = apt ]; then
sudo apt-get update -y
sudo apt-get install --only-upgrade -y getty-images
else
sudo dnf upgrade --security -y getty-images
fi
# 4. Verify
if [ "$PKG_MGR" = apt ]; then
NEW=$(dpkg-query -W -f='${Version}' getty-images)
else
NEW=$(rpm -q --queryformat '%{VERSION}' getty-images)
fi
log "After upgrade: $NEW"
log "Done. Compare $NEW against <patched-version> and restart the affected service if needed."
If you cannot patch immediately
These are runnable hardening commands. They reduce blast radius but they are not a replacement for the vendor patch.
No official vendor workaround is published for this CVE; patching is the documented fix. The runnable hardening below is generic defense in depth, not a substitute for the patch.
Restrict the affected service to trusted networks (Linux):
# Vendor advisory: https://patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Plugin/getty-images/vulnerability/wordpress-getty-images-plugin-4-1-0-server-side-request-forgery-ssrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve
sudo iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport <port> -s 10.0.0.0/24 -j ACCEPT
sudo iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport <port> -j DROP
Windows Firewall equivalent:
# Vendor advisory: https://patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Plugin/getty-images/vulnerability/wordpress-getty-images-plugin-4-1-0-server-side-request-forgery-ssrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve
New-NetFirewallRule -DisplayName 'Allow affected service from admin subnet' -Direction Inbound -Action Allow -Protocol TCP -LocalPort <port> -RemoteAddress 10.0.0.0/24
New-NetFirewallRule -DisplayName 'Block affected service from everywhere else' -Direction Inbound -Action Block -Protocol TCP -LocalPort <port>
How to verify the fix worked
Run the version probe again and confirm the running build matches the Fixed in row above.
dpkg -l | grep -i "getty" # Debian/Ubuntu
rpm -qa | grep -i "getty" # RHEL/CentOS/Rocky
Expected output: the package version should meet or exceed the patched build.
Re-run any vulnerability scanner you used previously and confirm the finding for CVE-2026-39630 has cleared. Sweep your logs for indicators of compromise listed in the vendor or CISA advisory, especially if the system was internet-reachable during the disclosure window.
Frequently asked questions
Is CVE-2026-39630 being actively exploited?
Not at the time of writing. It is not listed in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. That status can change, so monitor the vendor advisory and the KEV catalog if the system is exposed.
How severe is CVE-2026-39630?
CVSS rates it 6.4 (Medium). Use that score to set your patch priority alongside the other items in your queue.
Do I have to take Getty Images offline to apply the patch?
It depends on the deployment. High-availability or clustered installs can usually patch one node at a time with no full outage. Standalone installs typically need a short restart. Always follow the vendor's documented upgrade steps.
What if my vulnerability scanner still flags CVE-2026-39630 after I patch?
Re-run the scan after a service restart, then confirm the scanner's plugin set is up to date. Some scanners detect by banner version only and lag the official fix metadata by a release.
References
- Official vendor advisory: https://patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Plugin/getty-images/vulnerability/wordpress-getty-images-plugin-4-1-0-server-side-request-forgery-ssrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve
- NVD entry: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-39630
- CISA KEV catalog: https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog
*Written by Sai Kiran Pandrala. Last verified 2026-05-25. Sourced from the official vendor advisory, the NVD record, and the CISA KEV listing. Always confirm against the vendor advisory before applying changes in production.*