How to Fix CVE-2026-41402: CWE-706: Use of Incorrectly-Resolved Name or Reference in OpenClaw
By Sai Kiran Pandrala
Related fixes
Other vulnerabilities in the same area that are worth patching alongside this one:
- How to Fix CVE-2026-6116: OS command injection in A7100RU — OS command injection in A7100RU
- How to Fix CVE-2026-27707: Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in seerr — Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in seerr
- How to Fix CVE-2026-35458: Gotenberg has a ReDoS via extraHttpHeaders scope feature in gotenberg , Gotenberg has a ReDoS via extraHttpHeaders scope feature in gotenberg
- How to Fix CVE-2026-4918: Guardium Data Protection (Bundle Sibling) , Guardium Data Protection (Bundle Sibling)
- How to Fix CVE-2026-20431: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling in MediaTek chipset , Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling in MediaTek chipset
Last verified: 2026-05-25
CVE-2026-41402 is a cwe-706: use of incorrectly-resolved name or reference in OpenClaw OpenClaw. Fix it by upgrading to 2026.3.31.
| Severity | CVSS 2.3 - Low |
|---|---|
| Actively exploited? | Not currently in the CISA KEV catalog |
| Affected | OpenClaw 0 up to (excluding) 2026.3.31 |
| Fixed in | 2026.3.31 |
| Type (CWE) | CWE-706: CWE-706: Use of Incorrectly-Resolved Name or Reference |
What is CVE-2026-41402?
CVE-2026-41402 is a cwe-706: use of incorrectly-resolved name or reference flaw in OpenClaw OpenClaw. It carries a CVSS base score of 2.3 (low). It is not currently listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.
From the source record: OpenClaw before 2026.3.31 contains a scope bypass vulnerability in webhook replay cache deduplication that allows authenticated attackers to replay messages across sibling targets using the same messageId. Attackers can exploit overly broad cache keying to bypass replay protection and deliver duplicate webhook messages to unintended targets.
Why it matters in practice: The blast radius depends on how the affected service is exposed. An internet-facing instance with no compensating controls is the highest-risk configuration.
Am I affected?
You are affected if your installation of OpenClaw matches a version listed in the Affected row above.
Check the running version against the Affected row above using the product's admin console or --version flag.
How to fix CVE-2026-41402
Apply the vendor patch. Target the build named in the Fixed in row above (2026.3.31). The runnable command set below covers the most common deployment patterns for OpenClaw.
Generic upgrade pattern
If the affected product is a Linux package, upgrade via the system package manager:
# Debian / Ubuntu
sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get upgrade -y
# RHEL / Rocky / Alma
sudo dnf upgrade --security -y
If it ships as a Windows installer, download the patched build from the vendor advisory and:
# Vendor advisory: https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/security/advisories/GHSA-hhq4-97c2-p447
Start-Process msiexec.exe -ArgumentList '/i <patched-installer>.msi /qn /norestart' -Wait
Get-ItemProperty HKLM:\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall\* | \
Where-Object DisplayName -match '<product-name>' | Select-Object DisplayName, DisplayVersion
After applying the patch
- Restart the service or device so the patched binary loads.
- Confirm the running version matches the Fixed in row using the verification command below.
- Rotate credentials and API keys that the affected service could access if the asset was exposed during the disclosure window.
If you can't patch immediately
Until the patch lands, narrow the attack surface with these runnable controls.
Restrict network exposure
Block public access to the affected service at the perimeter. Allow only trusted source IPs.
# Linux iptables: only allow trusted admin subnet
sudo iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 443 -s 10.10.10.0/24 -j ACCEPT
sudo iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 443 -j DROP
sudo iptables-save | sudo tee /etc/iptables/rules.v4
# Windows firewall: only allow trusted admin subnet on management port
New-NetFirewallRule -DisplayName "Restrict-Mgmt-Allow" -Direction Inbound -Action Allow `
-RemoteAddress 10.10.10.0/24 -Protocol TCP -LocalPort 443
New-NetFirewallRule -DisplayName "Restrict-Mgmt-Deny" -Direction Inbound -Action Block `
-Protocol TCP -LocalPort 443
Mitigations are temporary. Apply the vendor patch as soon as a maintenance window opens.
How to verify the fix worked
Confirm the patched build is the one actually running.
Check the running version against the Affected row above using the product's admin console or --version flag.
Expected: a version at or above 2026.3.31.
Also worth doing: pull recent log windows for indicators of compromise listed in the vendor advisory, and re-run an authenticated vulnerability scan with up-to-date signatures.
Frequently asked questions
Is CVE-2026-41402 being exploited in the wild?
As of 2026-05-25, CVE-2026-41402 is not listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. Watch the catalog and patch on a normal cadence; KEV status can change as exploitation evidence emerges.
What is the CVSS score for CVE-2026-41402?
The CVSS base score is 2.3 (Low).
What version fixes this?
Upgrade to 2026.3.31.
Will a WAF or IDS rule alone close this?
No. Network filters cut down opportunistic scans but they do not remove the flaw. The vendor patch is the only durable fix.
References
- Official vendor advisory: https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/security/advisories/GHSA-hhq4-97c2-p447
- NVD entry: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-41402
- CISA KEV catalog: https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog
- Additional reference: https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/commit/4d038bb242c11f39e45f6a4bde400e5fd42e4ebf
- Additional reference: https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/openclaw-webhook-replay-cache-cross-target-messageid-scope-bypass
*Assembled from the official vendor advisory, the NVD record, and the CISA KEV listing on 2026-05-25. Always confirm against the vendor advisory before applying changes in production.*