How to Fix CVE-2026-43025: netfilter: ctnetlink: ignore explicit helper on new expectations in Linux

By Sai Kiran Pandrala

Related fixes

Other vulnerabilities in the same area that are worth patching alongside this one:

• How to Fix CVE-2026-43152: Security Vulnerability in Linux — Security Vulnerability in Linux
• How to Fix CVE-2026-31575: mm/userfaultfd: fix hugetlb fault mutex hash calculation in Linux — mm/userfaultfd: fix hugetlb fault mutex hash calculation in Linux
• How to Fix CVE-2026-31549: i2c: cp2615: fix serial string NULL-deref at probe in Linux , i2c: cp2615: fix serial string NULL-deref at probe in Linux
• How to Fix CVE-2026-43300: Security Vulnerability in Linux , Security Vulnerability in Linux
• How to Fix CVE-2026-43214: Security Vulnerability in Linux , Security Vulnerability in Linux

Last verified: 2026-05-25

CVE-2026-43025 is a netfilter: ctnetlink: ignore explicit helper on new expectations in Linux Linux. Fix it by upgrading to 6.1.168, 6.6.134, 6.12.81, 6.18.22, 6.19.12, 7.0.

What is CVE-2026-43025?

CVE-2026-43025 is a netfilter: ctnetlink: ignore explicit helper on new expectations flaw in Linux Linux. It carries a CVSS base score of 7.3 (high). It is not currently listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.

From the source record: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

netfilter: ctnetlink: ignore explicit helper on new expectations

Use the existing master conntrack helper, anything else is not really

supported and it just makes validation more complicated, so just ignore

what helper userspace suggests for this expectation.

This was uncovered when validating CTA_EXPECT_CLASS via different helper

provided by userspace than the existing master conntrack helper:

BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in nf_ct_expect_related_report+0x2479/0x27c0

Read of size 4 at addr ffff8880043fe408 by task poc/102

Call Trace:

nf_ct_expect_related_report+0x2479/0x27c0

ctnetlink_create_expect+0x22b/0x3b0

ctnetlink_new_expect+0x4bd/0x5c0

nfnetlink_rcv_msg+0x67a/0x950

netlink_rcv_skb+0x120/0x350

Allowing to read kernel memory bytes off the expectation boundary.

Why it matters in practice: The blast radius depends on how the affected service is exposed. An internet-facing instance with no compensating controls is the highest-risk configuration.

Am I affected?

You are affected if your installation of Linux matches a version listed in the Affected row above.

# Debian/Ubuntu
dpkg -s linux | grep Version
# RHEL/Rocky
rpm -q linux

How to fix CVE-2026-43025

Apply the vendor patch. Target the build named in the Fixed in row above (6.1.168, 6.6.134, 6.12.81, 6.18.22, 6.19.12, 7.0). The runnable command set below covers the most common deployment patterns for Linux.

Ubuntu / Debian

sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install --only-upgrade linux
dpkg -s linux | grep Version

RHEL / CentOS / Rocky

sudo dnf upgrade linux -y
rpm -q linux

After applying the patch

1. Restart the service or device so the patched binary loads.
2. Confirm the running version matches the Fixed in row using the verification command below.
3. Rotate credentials and API keys that the affected service could access if the asset was exposed during the disclosure window.

If you can't patch immediately

Until the patch lands, narrow the attack surface with these runnable controls.

Restrict network exposure

Block public access to the affected service at the perimeter. Allow only trusted source IPs.

# Linux iptables: only allow trusted admin subnet
sudo iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 443 -s 10.10.10.0/24 -j ACCEPT
sudo iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 443 -j DROP
sudo iptables-save | sudo tee /etc/iptables/rules.v4

# Windows firewall: only allow trusted admin subnet on management port
New-NetFirewallRule -DisplayName "Restrict-Mgmt-Allow" -Direction Inbound -Action Allow `
  -RemoteAddress 10.10.10.0/24 -Protocol TCP -LocalPort 443
New-NetFirewallRule -DisplayName "Restrict-Mgmt-Deny"  -Direction Inbound -Action Block `
  -Protocol TCP -LocalPort 443

Mitigations are temporary. Apply the vendor patch as soon as a maintenance window opens.

How to verify the fix worked

Confirm the patched build is the one actually running.

# Debian/Ubuntu
dpkg -s linux | grep Version
# RHEL/Rocky
rpm -q linux

Expected: a version at or above 6.1.168, 6.6.134, 6.12.81, 6.18.22, 6.19.12, 7.0.

Also worth doing: pull recent log windows for indicators of compromise listed in the vendor advisory, and re-run an authenticated vulnerability scan with up-to-date signatures.

Frequently asked questions

Is CVE-2026-43025 being exploited in the wild?

As of 2026-05-25, CVE-2026-43025 is not listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. Watch the catalog and patch on a normal cadence; KEV status can change as exploitation evidence emerges.

What is the CVSS score for CVE-2026-43025?

The CVSS base score is 7.3 (High).

What version fixes this?

Upgrade to 6.1.168, 6.6.134, 6.12.81, 6.18.22, 6.19.12, 7.0.

Will a WAF or IDS rule alone close this?

No. Network filters cut down opportunistic scans but they do not remove the flaw. The vendor patch is the only durable fix.

References

• Official vendor advisory: https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e135f8e8212cbed12a03ab8dec77fa1247139897
• NVD entry: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-43025
• CISA KEV catalog: https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog
• Additional reference: https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2ea0f35f235f70c133ad61fe05ba013753b978c6
• Additional reference: https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0f6c33697ccfac6499d0b7a4dbdec5d3a3a566cd
• Additional reference: https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/187b6ec5229ea93cb04c4f6d3b52efc80f513d0d
• Additional reference: https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/21a04c31db4057deec85fcd6cc63d720b38819c3

*Assembled from the official vendor advisory, the NVD record, and the CISA KEV listing on 2026-05-25. Always confirm against the vendor advisory before applying changes in production.*