How to Fix CVE-2026-43992: Information Disclosure in junoclaw
Related fixes
Other vulnerabilities in the same area that are worth patching alongside this one:
- How to Fix CVE-2026-28696: Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in cms — Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in cms
- How to Fix CVE-2026-6401: Cross-Site Request Forgery in Bottom Bar — Cross-Site Request Forgery in Bottom Bar
- How to Fix CVE-2026-33299: OpenEMR has Stored XSS in patient encounter Eye Exam form answers , OpenEMR has Stored XSS in patient encounter Eye Exam form answers
- How to Fix CVE-2026-4577: Critical Vulnerability in Exam Form Submission , Critical Vulnerability in Exam Form Submission
- How to Fix CVE-2026-6750: Improper privilege management in Firefox , Improper privilege management in Firefox
*By Sai Kiran Pandrala*
| Severity | CVSS 9.8 - Critical |
|---|---|
| Actively exploited? | Not currently listed in CISA KEV |
| Affected | < v0.x.y-security-1 |
| Fixed in | 0.x.y-security-1. |
| Type (CWE) | CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor |
What is CVE-2026-43992?
CVE-2026-43992 is an information disclosure flaw in junoclaw. The product returns sensitive data to a caller who should not have access, including credentials, session tokens, or configuration. Disclosure often feeds a follow-up attack chain. Vendor description: JunoClaw is an agentic AI platform built on Juno Network. Prior to 0.x.y-security-1, every MCP write tool (send_tokens, execute_contract, instantiate_contract, upload_wasm, ibc_transfer, etc.) accepted 'mnemonic: string' as an explicit tool-call parameter.
Why this CVE matters
Information disclosure flaws are dangerous because they make the next attack easier. Sensitive configuration, session material, or credentials leaked from one endpoint frequently power the follow-on attack that actually takes over the system.
For deployments of junoclaw that have been exposed to the public internet during the disclosure window, the operating assumption should be that scanning has already happened. Even where exploitation has not been publicly observed, scanning for the vulnerable fingerprint is cheap and routine. Patching closes the door; log review and credential rotation close out the rest of the response.
Am I affected?
You are affected if your installation matches any of these version ranges:
- junoclaw: < v0.x.y-security-1
Check your installed version against the list above. If you cannot determine the version, treat the system as affected and follow the upgrade path below.
Open junoclaw's About dialog or run the vendor-documented version-check command. Compare the result against the affected ranges in the advisory.
How to fix CVE-2026-43992
- Read the vendor advisory in full: https://github.com/Dragonmonk111/junoclaw/security/advisories/GHSA-j75q-8xvm-6c48
- Upgrade junoclaw to the patched build listed in the vendor advisory.
- Back up the configuration (and database, where applicable) before upgrading.
- Apply the patch in a maintenance window. For HA pairs, upgrade the standby node first, fail over, then upgrade the former primary.
- Restart the affected service so the patched binary loads, then verify the new version (see verification section).
Upgrade Dragonmonk111 junoclaw
# CVE-2026-43992 affects junoclaw < v0.x.y-security-1.
# Fixed in v0.x.y-security-1. Vendor advisory: https://github.com/Dragonmonk111/junoclaw/security/advisories/GHSA-j75q-8xvm-6c48
# 1. Identify the running version using the vendor-documented command.
# (Open the product UI -> About, or run the CLI version probe.)
# 2. Stage the patched build named in the advisory.
# Vendor advisory: https://github.com/Dragonmonk111/junoclaw/security/advisories/GHSA-j75q-8xvm-6c48
# 3. Apply the upgrade. If the vendor ships a Linux package, pull it via your
# distribution's package manager:
sudo apt update && sudo apt install --only-upgrade junoclaw # Debian / Ubuntu
sudo dnf upgrade junoclaw # RHEL / Rocky / Alma / Fedora
# 4. Restart the affected service so the new binary loads.
sudo systemctl restart junoclaw 2>/dev/null || true
# 5. Re-run the version probe and confirm it matches v0.x.y-security-1.
# Windows-hosted installs of junoclaw: apply via PSWindowsUpdate or the vendor MSI.
Install-Module PSWindowsUpdate -Force -SkipPublisherCheck -Confirm:$false
Get-WindowsUpdate -AcceptAll -Install -AutoReboot
Verify the fix landed
# CVE-2026-43992 verification checklist.
# 1. Confirm the running version matches v0.x.y-security-1 (replace the version probe with
# the platform-specific command shown above).
# 2. Re-scan the host with your vulnerability scanner (Nessus, Qualys, Tenable,
# OpenVAS, Wazuh). The scanner must no longer flag CVE-2026-43992.
# 3. Inspect recent service and kernel logs for crash-loops or rollback events.
journalctl -u <service-name> --since "10 minutes ago"
dmesg --since "10 minutes ago"
# 4. Cross-check the running build against the vendor advisory:
# https://github.com/Dragonmonk111/junoclaw/security/advisories/GHSA-j75q-8xvm-6c48
If you cannot patch immediately
No official workaround exists beyond restricting network exposure to the affected component. Apply the vendor patch as the primary remediation.
How to verify the fix worked
- After applying the patch, verify the running version in the product's admin UI or via the vendor-documented CLI command.
- Confirm the patched build matches the version listed in the vendor advisory.
- Run an authenticated vulnerability scan with a current signature set and confirm the scanner no longer flags CVE-2026-43992.
- Review logs for the entire pre-patch window for indicators of compromise listed in the vendor or CISA advisory.
- Confirm any network-layer mitigations that were applied as a stopgap have been reverted (or left in place intentionally) once the patch is verified.
If your installation was internet-reachable during the disclosure window, treat log review as part of the remediation rather than an optional follow-up. Look for unusually long URI paths containing traversal sequences, unexpectedly large responses from the affected endpoint, and outbound requests from the application to internal addresses or cloud-metadata endpoints. Treat any sensitive file the bug could disclose as exposed.
Frequently asked questions
Is CVE-2026-43992 being exploited in the wild?
Public exploitation has not been confirmed by CISA at the time of writing. Treat the patch as time-sensitive anyway; reports often lag actual abuse.
Will a WAF or IDS rule fully mitigate CVE-2026-43992?
No. Network-layer filters can reduce noise and slow opportunistic scanners, but they will not stop a determined attacker. The vendor patch is the only durable fix.
How long should I plan for the upgrade?
Typical vendor-documented upgrade windows for junoclaw run from a few minutes to under an hour depending on cluster size. Test in a staging environment first and follow the vendor's documented HA upgrade order.
References
- Official vendor advisory: https://github.com/Dragonmonk111/junoclaw/security/advisories/GHSA-j75q-8xvm-6c48
- NVD entry: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-43992
- CISA KEV catalog: https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog
- Additional vendor or research reference: https://github.com/Dragonmonk111/junoclaw/commit/339701e
- Additional vendor or research reference: https://github.com/Dragonmonk111/junoclaw/releases/tag/v0.x.y-security-1
*This guide was assembled from the official vendor advisory, the NVD record, and the CISA KEV catalog entry on 2026-05-25. Always confirm against the vendor advisory before applying changes in production.*