How to Fix CVE-2026-44578: SSRF Vulnerability in next.js
Related fixes
Other vulnerabilities in the same area that are worth patching alongside this one:
- How to Fix CVE-2026-27674: Code injection flaw in SAP NetWeaver Application Server Java (Web Dynpro Java) — Code injection flaw in SAP NetWeaver Application Server Java (Web Dynpro Java)
- How to Fix CVE-2026-41230: CWE-93: Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences ('CRLF Injection') in froxlor — CWE-93: Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences ('CRLF Injection') in froxlor
- How to Fix CVE-2026-9224: Missing Authorization in Server , Missing Authorization in Server
- How to Fix CVE-2026-28039: Improper control of filename for include/require statement in php program ('php. , Improper control of filename for include/require statement in php program ('php.
- How to Fix CVE-2026-44212: Cross-Site Scripting in PrestaShop , Cross-Site Scripting in PrestaShop
*By Sai Kiran Pandrala*
| Severity | CVSS 8.6 - High |
|---|---|
| Actively exploited? | Not currently listed in CISA KEV |
| Affected | >= 16.0.0, < 16.2.5, >= 13.4.13, < 15.5.16 |
| Fixed in | 15.5.16 |
| Type (CWE) | CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) |
What is CVE-2026-44578?
CVE-2026-44578 is an server-side request forgery (SSRF) flaw in next.js. The product makes server-side HTTP requests to attacker-controlled URLs, exposing internal services and cloud metadata endpoints. Vendor description: Next.js is a React framework for building full-stack web applications. From 13.4.13 to before 15.5.16 and 16.2.5, self-hosted applications using the built-in Node.js server can be vulnerable to server-side request forgery through crafted WebSocket upgrade requests.
Why this CVE matters
Server-side request forgery routinely chains into cloud-metadata theft, internal service enumeration, and credential exfiltration. In cloud-hosted deployments the impact is often more severe than on-prem because of the metadata service exposure.
For deployments of next.js that have been exposed to the public internet during the disclosure window, the operating assumption should be that scanning has already happened. Even where exploitation has not been publicly observed, scanning for the vulnerable fingerprint is cheap and routine. Patching closes the door; log review and credential rotation close out the rest of the response.
Am I affected?
You are affected if your installation matches any of these version ranges:
- next.js: >= 16.0.0, < 16.2.5
- next.js: >= 13.4.13, < 15.5.16
Check your installed version against the list above. If you cannot determine the version, treat the system as affected and follow the upgrade path below.
Open next.js's About dialog or run the vendor-documented version-check command. Compare the result against the affected ranges in the advisory.
How to fix CVE-2026-44578
- Read the vendor advisory in full: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/security/advisories/GHSA-c4j6-fc7j-m34r
- Upgrade next.js to the patched build listed in the vendor advisory.
- Back up the configuration (and database, where applicable) before upgrading.
- Apply the patch in a maintenance window. For HA pairs, upgrade the standby node first, fail over, then upgrade the former primary.
- Restart the affected service so the patched binary loads, then verify the new version (see verification section).
Update the npm package
# CVE-2026-44578 affects next.js >= 16.0.0, < 16.2.5. Fixed in 16.2.5.
# Vendor advisory: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/security/advisories/GHSA-c4j6-fc7j-m34r
# 1. Show the currently resolved version inside the project.
npm ls next.js
# 2. Update to the patched release named in the advisory.
npm install next.js@16.2.5
npm audit fix
# 3. Lock-file enforcement for CI / production.
npm ci
# 4. Verify.
npm ls next.js
# The resolved version must match 16.2.5 (or a later patched release).
# Same flow from a Windows admin workstation.
npm install next.js@16.2.5
npm ls next.js
Verify the fix landed
# CVE-2026-44578 verification checklist.
# 1. Confirm the running version matches 16.2.5 (replace the version probe with
# the platform-specific command shown above).
# 2. Re-scan the host with your vulnerability scanner (Nessus, Qualys, Tenable,
# OpenVAS, Wazuh). The scanner must no longer flag CVE-2026-44578.
# 3. Inspect recent service and kernel logs for crash-loops or rollback events.
journalctl -u <service-name> --since "10 minutes ago"
dmesg --since "10 minutes ago"
# 4. Cross-check the running build against the vendor advisory:
# https://github.com/vercel/next.js/security/advisories/GHSA-c4j6-fc7j-m34r
If you cannot patch immediately
Block outbound network access from the affected service to internal subnets and cloud metadata endpoints (e.g. 169.254.169.254). Apply the patched build.
How to verify the fix worked
- After applying the patch, verify the running version in the product's admin UI or via the vendor-documented CLI command.
- Confirm the patched build matches the version listed in the vendor advisory.
- Run an authenticated vulnerability scan with a current signature set and confirm the scanner no longer flags CVE-2026-44578.
- Review logs for the entire pre-patch window for indicators of compromise listed in the vendor or CISA advisory.
- Confirm any network-layer mitigations that were applied as a stopgap have been reverted (or left in place intentionally) once the patch is verified.
If your installation was internet-reachable during the disclosure window, treat log review as part of the remediation rather than an optional follow-up. Look for unusually long URI paths containing traversal sequences, unexpectedly large responses from the affected endpoint, and outbound requests from the application to internal addresses or cloud-metadata endpoints. Treat any sensitive file the bug could disclose as exposed.
Frequently asked questions
Is CVE-2026-44578 being exploited in the wild?
Public exploitation has not been confirmed by CISA at the time of writing. Treat the patch as time-sensitive anyway; reports often lag actual abuse.
Will a WAF or IDS rule fully mitigate CVE-2026-44578?
No. Network-layer filters can reduce noise and slow opportunistic scanners, but they will not stop a determined attacker. The vendor patch is the only durable fix.
How long should I plan for the upgrade?
Typical vendor-documented upgrade windows for next.js run from a few minutes to under an hour depending on cluster size. Test in a staging environment first and follow the vendor's documented HA upgrade order.
References
- Official vendor advisory: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/security/advisories/GHSA-c4j6-fc7j-m34r
- NVD entry: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-44578
- CISA KEV catalog: https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog
*This guide was assembled from the official vendor advisory, the NVD record, and the CISA KEV catalog entry on 2026-05-25. Always confirm against the vendor advisory before applying changes in production.*