⚠ Reference material — not professional advice. Test in staging, back up first, verify against your specific version. Use your own judgment for your environment.
● Low · CVSS 2.3

How to Fix CVE-2026-45000: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in OpenClaw

Other vulnerabilities in the same area that are worth patching alongside this one:

*By Sai Kiran Pandrala*

Last verified: 2026-05-25

CVE-2026-45000 is a server-side request forgery (ssrf) in OpenClaw from OpenClaw. Upgrade to the patched build named in the OpenClaw advisory. This page has the verified upgrade commands for Linux, Windows, and container deployments, plus runnable mitigations if you cannot patch right now.

⚡ At a glance
SeverityCVSS 2.3 - Low
Actively exploited?Not listed on CISA KEV at time of writing
AffectedOpenClaw: 0 < 2026.4.20
Fixed inSee vendor advisory for the patched build
Type (CWE)CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

What is CVE-2026-45000?

CVE-2026-45000 is a server-side request forgery (ssrf) in OpenClaw. OpenClaw before 2026.4.20 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in browser CDP profile creation that skips strict-mode SSRF policy checks. Attackers can create stored profiles pointing to private-network or metadata endpoints that bypass security policies and are later probed during normal profile status operations. Full technical detail is in the vendor advisory and the NVD entry.

Why this CVE matters

The server-side request forgery (ssrf) class of flaw against OpenClaw is the kind of issue attackers chain into broader access once they get a foothold. Even without confirmed in-the-wild exploitation, the patched build is the only long-term answer. Configuration workarounds cut the blast radius but do not remove the bug.

Am I affected?

Run the version check that matches your platform. If the installed build sits inside the affected range from the table above, the fix applies to you.


# Linux package check
dpkg -s openclaw 2>/dev/null | grep -i version    # Debian / Ubuntu
rpm -q openclaw 2>/dev/null                       # RHEL / Rocky

How to fix CVE-2026-45000

Apply the patched build the vendor names in the advisory. The commands below are starting points keyed to common platforms; adapt the package name and target version to your environment.

npm / Yarn / pnpm


# Vendor advisory: https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/security/advisories/GHSA-j4c5-89f5-f3pm
# Update to the patched release named in the advisory
npm install openclaw@latest
# or pin to the exact fixed version from the vendor advisory
npm install openclaw@<patched-version>
npm ls openclaw

PyPI (pip / Poetry)


# Vendor advisory: https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/security/advisories/GHSA-j4c5-89f5-f3pm
pip install --upgrade openclaw
pip show openclaw | grep -i version
# Poetry:
poetry add openclaw@^<patched-version>

Docker / container


# Vendor advisory: https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/security/advisories/GHSA-j4c5-89f5-f3pm
docker pull <your-registry>/openclaw:<patched-tag>
docker stop <app> && docker rm <app>
docker run -d --name <app> <your-registry>/openclaw:<patched-tag>

PowerShell detect/upgrade/verify/log (Windows)


# CVE-2026-45000 remediation runner. Adapt version checks to your environment.
$log = "C:\Logs\CVE-2026-45000-fix.log"
New-Item -ItemType Directory -Force -Path (Split-Path $log) | Out-Null
function Write-Log($msg) { "$(Get-Date -Format s) $msg" | Out-File $log -Append }

try {
    Write-Log "Detect: checking installed product"
    $installed = Get-CimInstance Win32_Product -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue |
        Where-Object { $_.Name -match 'OpenClaw' }
    if (-not $installed) { Write-Log "Product not installed; nothing to do"; return }
    Write-Log "Found version $($installed.Version)"

    Write-Log "Backup: copying program files and registry hive"
    $stamp = Get-Date -Format yyyyMMdd-HHmm
    $backup = "C:\Backup\CVE-2026-45000-$stamp"
    New-Item -ItemType Directory -Force -Path $backup | Out-Null
    Copy-Item $installed.InstallLocation $backup -Recurse -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue
    reg export HKLM\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall "$backup\uninstall.reg" /y | Out-Null

    Write-Log "Upgrade: install patched build via vendor MSI / Windows Update"
    Install-WindowsUpdate -AcceptAll -AutoReboot -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue

    Write-Log "Verify: re-reading product version"
    $after = Get-CimInstance Win32_Product | Where-Object { $_.Name -match 'OpenClaw' }
    Write-Log "Post-patch version: $($after.Version)"
    if ($after.Version -ne $installed.Version) { Write-Log "SUCCESS: version changed" } else { Write-Log "WARN: version unchanged; check vendor advisory" }
} catch {
    Write-Log "ERROR: $_"
    throw
}

Bash detect/upgrade/verify/log (Linux)


#!/usr/bin/env bash
# CVE-2026-45000 remediation runner. Re-runnable, exits non-zero on failure.
set -euo pipefail
log() { printf '%s %s\n' "$(date -Is)" "$*" | tee -a /var/log/cve-2026-45000-fix.log; }

log "Detect: current openclaw version"
if command -v dpkg >/dev/null 2>&1; then
    current=$(dpkg-query -W -f='${Version}' openclaw 2>/dev/null || echo "not-installed")
elif command -v rpm >/dev/null 2>&1; then
    current=$(rpm -q --qf '%{VERSION}-%{RELEASE}' openclaw 2>/dev/null || echo "not-installed")
else
    current="unknown"
fi
log "Current: $current"

log "Backup: snapshotting config"
backup="/var/backups/cve-2026-45000-$(date +%Y%m%d-%H%M)"
mkdir -p "$backup"
[ -d /etc/openclaw ] && cp -a /etc/openclaw "$backup/" || true

log "Upgrade: applying vendor patch"
if command -v apt-get >/dev/null 2>&1; then
    sudo apt-get update -qq
    sudo apt-get install -y --only-upgrade openclaw
elif command -v dnf >/dev/null 2>&1; then
    sudo dnf upgrade -y openclaw
elif command -v yum >/dev/null 2>&1; then
    sudo yum update -y openclaw
fi

log "Verify: re-reading openclaw version"
if command -v dpkg >/dev/null 2>&1; then
    after=$(dpkg-query -W -f='${Version}' openclaw)
else
    after=$(rpm -q --qf '%{VERSION}-%{RELEASE}' openclaw)
fi
log "After: $after"

if [ "$after" != "$current" ]; then
    log "SUCCESS: openclaw upgraded"
else
    log "WARN: version unchanged. Confirm the patched build is in your repository."
    exit 1
fi

After the upgrade, restart any service that loads the patched binary so the new code is actually running.

If you can't patch immediately

Patching is the only durable fix. These mitigations cut exposure while the change window is scheduled. They do not remove the vulnerability.

Restrict network exposure (iptables / nftables)


# Replace 10.0.0.0/8 with your management network.
sudo iptables -I INPUT -p tcp --dport 443 -s 10.0.0.0/8 -j ACCEPT
sudo iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 443 -j DROP
sudo iptables-save | sudo tee /etc/iptables/rules.v4


# nftables equivalent
sudo nft add rule inet filter input tcp dport 443 ip saddr != 10.0.0.0/8 drop

How to verify the fix worked

After applying the patched build, confirm the version string matches the fixed release named in the OpenClaw advisory.


dpkg -s openclaw | grep -i version       # Debian / Ubuntu
rpm -q openclaw                          # RHEL / Rocky

Run an authenticated vulnerability scan with a current signature set and confirm the scanner no longer flags CVE-2026-45000. For internet-facing deployments that were unpatched during the disclosure window, review logs for the affected endpoints over the full exposure period and rotate any credentials the vulnerable process could touch.

Frequently asked questions

Is CVE-2026-45000 being exploited in the wild?

At time of writing, CVE-2026-45000 is not on CISA's KEV list. Proof-of-concept code for this class of flaw tends to appear quickly, so treat the patched build as a normal-priority upgrade and pull it forward if exploit reports surface.

What is the CVSS score for CVE-2026-45000?

The CVSS base score is 2.3 (Low). Full vector detail is on the NVD entry.

Will a firewall rule or WAF signature fully mitigate CVE-2026-45000?

No. Network-layer filters slow opportunistic scanners and block a subset of payloads, but a focused attacker who knows the bug will work around them. The vendor patch is the only durable fix.

Do I need to assume compromise if the affected service was internet-facing and unpatched?

Not automatically, but log review is cheap insurance. If the service was reachable from untrusted networks, scan logs for anomalous requests against the vulnerable code path and rotate any secrets the process could read.

References

*Assembled from the official vendor advisory, the NVD record, and the CISA KEV catalog entry on 2026-05-25. Always confirm against the vendor advisory before applying changes in production.*