How to Fix CVE-2026-45054: SQL Injection in v6
Related fixes
Other vulnerabilities in the same area that are worth patching alongside this one:
- How to Fix CVE-2026-23814: Authenticated Command Injection found in AOS-CX CLI Command in AOS-CX — Authenticated Command Injection found in AOS-CX CLI Command in AOS-CX
- How to Fix CVE-2026-26031: Access Control Bypass in lms — Access Control Bypass in lms
- How to Fix CVE-2026-27352: Cross-site scripting in Starto , Cross-site scripting in Starto
- How to Fix CVE-2026-20983: Critical Vulnerability in Samsung Mobile Devices , Critical Vulnerability in Samsung Mobile Devices
- How to Fix CVE-2026-1506: Command Injection in DIR-615 , Command Injection in DIR-615
*By Sai Kiran Pandrala*
| Severity | CVSS 4.9 - Medium |
|---|---|
| Actively exploited? | Not currently listed in CISA KEV |
| Affected | < 6.7.0 |
| Fixed in | 6.7.0. |
| Type (CWE) | CWE-89: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') |
What is CVE-2026-45054?
CVE-2026-45054 is a SQL injection flaw in v6. User input reaches a database query without proper parameterization, letting an attacker read, modify, or in some cases execute commands through stacked queries or out-of-band channels. Vendor description: CubeCart is an ecommerce software solution. Prior to 6.7.0, the admin orders-transactions listing page (admin.php?_g=orders&node=transactions) builds a raw ORDER BY SQL fragment from the attacker-controlled $_GET['sort'] array without column or direction validation.
Why this CVE matters
SQL injection against a management product is rarely just a data leak. Once an attacker can read or write to the application database, the chain commonly ends with credential theft, persistence via scheduled tasks, or stacked queries that pivot into the operating system.
For deployments of v6 that have been exposed to the public internet during the disclosure window, the operating assumption should be that scanning has already happened. Even where exploitation has not been publicly observed, scanning for the vulnerable fingerprint is cheap and routine. Patching closes the door; log review and credential rotation close out the rest of the response.
Am I affected?
You are affected if your installation matches any of these version ranges:
- v6: < 6.7.0
Check your installed version against the list above. If you cannot determine the version, treat the system as affected and follow the upgrade path below.
Open v6's About dialog or run the vendor-documented version-check command. Compare the result against the affected ranges in the advisory.
How to fix CVE-2026-45054
- Read the vendor advisory in full: https://github.com/cubecart/v6/security/advisories/GHSA-rm2f-rpcq-6w9f
- Upgrade v6 to the patched build listed in the vendor advisory.
- Back up the configuration (and database, where applicable) before upgrading.
- Rotate any credentials, API keys, or session tokens that the vulnerable service touched. An unauthenticated RCE-class flaw means anything the process could see should be treated as exposed.
- Apply the patch in a maintenance window. For HA pairs, upgrade the standby node first, fail over, then upgrade the former primary.
- Restart the affected service so the patched binary loads, then verify the new version (see verification section).
Update the Composer / PHP package
# CVE-2026-45054 affects v6 < 6.7.0. Fixed in 6.7.0.
# Vendor advisory: https://github.com/cubecart/v6/security/advisories/GHSA-rm2f-rpcq-6w9f
# 1. Show the currently resolved version.
composer show cubecart/v6
# 2. Upgrade to the patched release named in the advisory.
composer require cubecart/v6:^6.7.0
composer update cubecart/v6
# 3. Verify.
composer show cubecart/v6
# PHP runtime on Debian / Ubuntu.
sudo apt update
sudo apt install --only-upgrade php
php -v
Verify the fix landed
# CVE-2026-45054 verification checklist.
# 1. Confirm the running version matches 6.7.0 (replace the version probe with
# the platform-specific command shown above).
# 2. Re-scan the host with your vulnerability scanner (Nessus, Qualys, Tenable,
# OpenVAS, Wazuh). The scanner must no longer flag CVE-2026-45054.
# 3. Inspect recent service and kernel logs for crash-loops or rollback events.
journalctl -u <service-name> --since "10 minutes ago"
dmesg --since "10 minutes ago"
# 4. Cross-check the running build against the vendor advisory:
# https://github.com/cubecart/v6/security/advisories/GHSA-rm2f-rpcq-6w9f
If you cannot patch immediately
Front the affected endpoint with a WAF rule that blocks SQL metacharacters in the vulnerable parameters. This is a stopgap, not a fix. Patch promptly.
How to verify the fix worked
- After applying the patch, verify the running version in the product's admin UI or via the vendor-documented CLI command.
- Confirm the patched build matches the version listed in the vendor advisory.
- Run an authenticated vulnerability scan with a current signature set and confirm the scanner no longer flags CVE-2026-45054.
- Review logs for the entire pre-patch window for indicators of compromise listed in the vendor or CISA advisory.
- Confirm any network-layer mitigations that were applied as a stopgap have been reverted (or left in place intentionally) once the patch is verified.
If your installation was internet-reachable during the disclosure window, treat log review as part of the remediation rather than an optional follow-up. Look for unexpected administrator accounts in v6, scheduled tasks or cron jobs you did not create, new files in web-accessible directories, and outbound connections to addresses not in your baseline. Suspicious requests to the vulnerable endpoint immediately followed by successful 200-class responses with unusually large bodies are a strong indicator of exploitation.
Frequently asked questions
Is CVE-2026-45054 being exploited in the wild?
Public exploitation has not been confirmed by CISA at the time of writing. Treat the patch as time-sensitive anyway; reports often lag actual abuse.
Will a WAF or IDS rule fully mitigate CVE-2026-45054?
No. Network-layer filters can reduce noise and slow opportunistic scanners, but they will not stop a determined attacker. The vendor patch is the only durable fix.
Do I need to assume compromise if my v6 was internet-facing and unpatched?
For an unauthenticated RCE-class flaw exposed to the public internet during the known exploitation window, yes. Review logs, rotate credentials the process could access, and look for unexpected accounts, scheduled tasks, or outbound connections.
References
- Official vendor advisory: https://github.com/cubecart/v6/security/advisories/GHSA-rm2f-rpcq-6w9f
- NVD entry: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-45054
- CISA KEV catalog: https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog
*This guide was assembled from the official vendor advisory, the NVD record, and the CISA KEV catalog entry on 2026-05-25. Always confirm against the vendor advisory before applying changes in production.*