How to Fix CVE-2026-4844: SQL Injection in Online Food Ordering System
Related fixes
Other vulnerabilities in the same area that are worth patching alongside this one:
- How to Fix CVE-2026-27574: Code injection in oneuptime — Code injection in oneuptime
- How to Fix CVE-2026-25465: Critical Vulnerability in CP Multi View Event Calendar — Critical Vulnerability in CP Multi View Event Calendar
- How to Fix CVE-2026-28538: Cwe-24 path traversal: '../filedir' in HarmonyOS , Cwe-24 path traversal: '../filedir' in HarmonyOS
- How to Fix CVE-2026-30560: Critical Vulnerability in n/a , Critical Vulnerability in n/a
- How to Fix CVE-2026-26065: Path Traversal in calibre , Path Traversal in calibre
*By Sai Kiran Pandrala*
| Severity | CVSS 6.9 - Medium |
|---|---|
| Actively exploited? | Not currently listed in CISA KEV |
| Affected | 1.0 |
| Fixed in | See vendor advisory |
| Type (CWE) | CWE-89: SQL Injection |
What is CVE-2026-4844?
CVE-2026-4844 is a SQL injection flaw in Online Food Ordering System. User input reaches a database query without proper parameterization, letting an attacker read, modify, or in some cases execute commands through stacked queries or out-of-band channels. Vendor description: A vulnerability was detected in code-projects Online Food Ordering System 1.0. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /admin.php of the component Admin Login Module.
Why this CVE matters
SQL injection against a management product is rarely just a data leak. Once an attacker can read or write to the application database, the chain commonly ends with credential theft, persistence via scheduled tasks, or stacked queries that pivot into the operating system.
For deployments of Online Food Ordering System that have been exposed to the public internet during the disclosure window, the operating assumption should be that scanning has already happened. Even where exploitation has not been publicly observed, scanning for the vulnerable fingerprint is cheap and routine. Patching closes the door; log review and credential rotation close out the rest of the response.
Am I affected?
You are affected if your installation matches any of these version ranges:
- Online Food Ordering System: 1.0
Check your installed version against the list above. If you cannot determine the version, treat the system as affected and follow the upgrade path below.
Open Online Food Ordering System's About dialog or run the vendor-documented version-check command. Compare the result against the affected ranges in the advisory.
How to fix CVE-2026-4844
- Read the vendor advisory in full: https://vuldb.com/?id.353149
- Upgrade Online Food Ordering System to the patched build listed in the vendor advisory.
- Back up the configuration (and database, where applicable) before upgrading.
- Rotate any credentials, API keys, or session tokens that the vulnerable service touched. An unauthenticated RCE-class flaw means anything the process could see should be treated as exposed.
- Apply the patch in a maintenance window. For HA pairs, upgrade the standby node first, fail over, then upgrade the former primary.
- Restart the affected service so the patched binary loads, then verify the new version (see verification section).
Open-source library upgrade
The vendor advisory (https://vuldb.com/?id.353149) names the patched release as the build named in the vendor advisory (https://vuldb.com/?id.353149). Pull the
fixed version through whichever ecosystem actually ships online-food-ordering-system.
# Vendor advisory: https://vuldb.com/?id.353149
# npm / pnpm / yarn
npm install online-food-ordering-system@latest
npm ls online-food-ordering-system
# Or pin to the patched version named in the advisory
npm install online-food-ordering-system@<patched-version>
# pip / Poetry
pip install --upgrade "online-food-ordering-system"
pip show online-food-ordering-system | grep -i version
poetry add "online-food-ordering-system@^<patched-version>"
# Go modules
go get example.com/online-food-ordering-system@<patched-version>
go mod tidy
# Rust crates
cargo update -p online-food-ordering-system
# Composer
composer require vendor/online-food-ordering-system:^<patched-version>
# Vendor advisory: https://vuldb.com/?id.353149
# Container image: rebuild against the patched base and roll the deployment.
docker pull <your-registry>/online-food-ordering-system:<patched-tag>
docker stop <app> && docker rm <app>
docker run -d --name <app> <your-registry>/online-food-ordering-system:<patched-tag>
# Kubernetes
kubectl set image deployment/<deployment-name> <container>=<your-registry>/online-food-ordering-system:<patched-tag>
kubectl rollout status deployment/<deployment-name>
Linux package upgrade
The vendor advisory (https://vuldb.com/?id.353149) names the patched build as the build named in the vendor advisory (https://vuldb.com/?id.353149).
# Ubuntu / Debian
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install --only-upgrade php
dpkg -s php | grep -i version
# RHEL / Rocky / AlmaLinux / Fedora
sudo dnf upgrade --refresh php -y
rpm -q php
# openSUSE
sudo zypper refresh && sudo zypper update php
# Restart the service that loads the patched binary
sudo systemctl restart php 2>/dev/null || true
sudo systemctl status php --no-pager 2>/dev/null || true
# Vendor advisory: https://vuldb.com/?id.353149
# Container deployments: rebuild with the patched package layer, then roll the workload.
docker pull <your-registry>/php:<patched-tag>
docker stop <app> && docker rm <app>
docker run -d --name <app> <your-registry>/php:<patched-tag>
# Kubernetes
kubectl set image deployment/<deployment-name> php=<your-registry>/php:<patched-tag>
kubectl rollout status deployment/<deployment-name>
Verify the fix landed
# Vendor advisory: https://vuldb.com/?id.353149
# 1. Compare the running version against the fixed build named above.
# (Replace the version probe with the platform-specific command from the block above.)
# 2. Re-scan with your vulnerability scanner (Nessus, Qualys, Tenable, OpenVAS).
# The scanner should no longer flag this CVE on the patched target.
# 3. Inspect recent service / kernel logs for crash loops or rollback events.
journalctl -u <service> --since "10 minutes ago"
dmesg --since "10 minutes ago"
If you cannot patch immediately
Front the affected endpoint with a WAF rule that blocks SQL metacharacters in the vulnerable parameters. This is a stopgap, not a fix. Patch promptly.
How to verify the fix worked
- After applying the patch, verify the running version in the product's admin UI or via the vendor-documented CLI command.
- Confirm the patched build matches the version listed in the vendor advisory.
- Run an authenticated vulnerability scan with a current signature set and confirm the scanner no longer flags CVE-2026-4844.
- Review logs for the entire pre-patch window for indicators of compromise listed in the vendor or CISA advisory.
- Confirm any network-layer mitigations that were applied as a stopgap have been reverted (or left in place intentionally) once the patch is verified.
If your installation was internet-reachable during the disclosure window, treat log review as part of the remediation rather than an optional follow-up. Look for unexpected administrator accounts in Online Food Ordering System, scheduled tasks or cron jobs you did not create, new files in web-accessible directories, and outbound connections to addresses not in your baseline. Suspicious requests to the vulnerable endpoint immediately followed by successful 200-class responses with unusually large bodies are a strong indicator of exploitation.
Frequently asked questions
Is CVE-2026-4844 being exploited in the wild?
Public exploitation has not been confirmed by CISA at the time of writing. Treat the patch as time-sensitive anyway; reports often lag actual abuse.
Will a WAF or IDS rule fully mitigate CVE-2026-4844?
No. Network-layer filters can reduce noise and slow opportunistic scanners, but they will not stop a determined attacker. The vendor patch is the only durable fix.
Do I need to assume compromise if my Online Food Ordering System was internet-facing and unpatched?
For an unauthenticated RCE-class flaw exposed to the public internet during the known exploitation window, yes. Review logs, rotate credentials the process could access, and look for unexpected accounts, scheduled tasks, or outbound connections.
References
- Official vendor advisory: https://vuldb.com/?id.353149
- NVD entry: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-4844
- CISA KEV catalog: https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog
- Additional vendor or research reference: https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.353149
- Additional vendor or research reference: https://vuldb.com/?submit.776137
- Additional vendor or research reference: https://gist.github.com/HxH404/8e5bd42c0f968a92a23edc5e7b879955
- Additional vendor or research reference: https://code-projects.org/
*This guide was assembled from the official vendor advisory, the NVD record, and the CISA KEV catalog entry on 2026-05-25. Always confirm against the vendor advisory before applying changes in production.*