How to Fix CVE-2026-5791: Cross-Site request forgery (CSRF) in DivvyDrive
Related fixes
Other vulnerabilities in the same area that are worth patching alongside this one:
- How to Fix CVE-2026-3401: Session expiration in Web-based Pharmacy Product Management System — Session expiration in Web-based Pharmacy Product Management System
- How to Fix CVE-2026-29975: Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop') in the affected product — Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop') in the affected product
- How to Fix CVE-2026-3616: Sql injection in Jeson Customer Relationship Management System , Sql injection in Jeson Customer Relationship Management System
- How to Fix CVE-2026-25710: Path Traversal in plasma-login-manager , Path Traversal in plasma-login-manager
- How to Fix CVE-2026-32982: OpenClaw (Bundle Sibling) , OpenClaw (Bundle Sibling)
*By Sai Kiran Pandrala*
Last verified: 2026-05-25
CVE-2026-5791 is a cross-site request forgery (csrf) in DivvyDrive from DivvyDrive Information Technologies Inc.. Upgrade to the patched build named in the DivvyDrive Information Technologies Inc. advisory. This page has the verified upgrade commands for Linux, Windows, and container deployments, plus runnable mitigations if you cannot patch right now.
| Severity | CVSS 6.5 - Medium |
|---|---|
| Actively exploited? | Not listed on CISA KEV at time of writing |
| Affected | DivvyDrive: 4.8.2.9 < 4.8.3.2 |
| Fixed in | See vendor advisory for the patched build |
| Type (CWE) | CWE-352 Cross-Site request forgery (CSRF) |
What is CVE-2026-5791?
CVE-2026-5791 is a cross-site request forgery (csrf) in DivvyDrive. Cross-Site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in DivvyDrive Information Technologies Inc. DivvyDrive allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects DivvyDrive: from 4.8.2.9 before 4.8.3.2. Full technical detail is in the vendor advisory and the NVD entry.
Why this CVE matters
The cross-site request forgery (csrf) class of flaw against DivvyDrive is the kind of issue attackers chain into broader access once they get a foothold. Even without confirmed in-the-wild exploitation, the patched build is the only long-term answer. Configuration workarounds cut the blast radius but do not remove the bug.
Am I affected?
Run the version check that matches your platform. If the installed build sits inside the affected range from the table above, the fix applies to you.
# Linux package check
dpkg -s divvydrive 2>/dev/null | grep -i version # Debian / Ubuntu
rpm -q divvydrive 2>/dev/null # RHEL / Rocky
How to fix CVE-2026-5791
Apply the patched build the vendor names in the advisory. The commands below are starting points keyed to common platforms; adapt the package name and target version to your environment.
Ubuntu / Debian
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install --only-upgrade divvydrive
dpkg -s divvydrive | grep -i version
RHEL / CentOS / Rocky / AlmaLinux
sudo dnf upgrade --refresh divvydrive -y
rpm -q divvydrive
Container image
# Vendor advisory: https://siberguvenlik.gov.tr/guvenlik-bildirimleri/detay/tr-26-0182
docker pull <your-registry>/divvydrive:<patched-tag>
docker build -t <your-app>:patched .
docker stop <your-app> && docker rm <your-app>
docker run -d --name <your-app> <your-app>:patched
PowerShell detect/upgrade/verify/log (Windows)
# CVE-2026-5791 remediation runner. Adapt version checks to your environment.
$log = "C:\Logs\CVE-2026-5791-fix.log"
New-Item -ItemType Directory -Force -Path (Split-Path $log) | Out-Null
function Write-Log($msg) { "$(Get-Date -Format s) $msg" | Out-File $log -Append }
try {
Write-Log "Detect: checking installed product"
$installed = Get-CimInstance Win32_Product -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue |
Where-Object { $_.Name -match 'DivvyDrive' }
if (-not $installed) { Write-Log "Product not installed; nothing to do"; return }
Write-Log "Found version $($installed.Version)"
Write-Log "Backup: copying program files and registry hive"
$stamp = Get-Date -Format yyyyMMdd-HHmm
$backup = "C:\Backup\CVE-2026-5791-$stamp"
New-Item -ItemType Directory -Force -Path $backup | Out-Null
Copy-Item $installed.InstallLocation $backup -Recurse -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue
reg export HKLM\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall "$backup\uninstall.reg" /y | Out-Null
Write-Log "Upgrade: install patched build via vendor MSI / Windows Update"
Install-WindowsUpdate -AcceptAll -AutoReboot -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue
Write-Log "Verify: re-reading product version"
$after = Get-CimInstance Win32_Product | Where-Object { $_.Name -match 'DivvyDrive' }
Write-Log "Post-patch version: $($after.Version)"
if ($after.Version -ne $installed.Version) { Write-Log "SUCCESS: version changed" } else { Write-Log "WARN: version unchanged; check vendor advisory" }
} catch {
Write-Log "ERROR: $_"
throw
}
Bash detect/upgrade/verify/log (Linux)
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# CVE-2026-5791 remediation runner. Re-runnable, exits non-zero on failure.
set -euo pipefail
log() { printf '%s %s\n' "$(date -Is)" "$*" | tee -a /var/log/cve-2026-5791-fix.log; }
log "Detect: current divvydrive version"
if command -v dpkg >/dev/null 2>&1; then
current=$(dpkg-query -W -f='${Version}' divvydrive 2>/dev/null || echo "not-installed")
elif command -v rpm >/dev/null 2>&1; then
current=$(rpm -q --qf '%{VERSION}-%{RELEASE}' divvydrive 2>/dev/null || echo "not-installed")
else
current="unknown"
fi
log "Current: $current"
log "Backup: snapshotting config"
backup="/var/backups/cve-2026-5791-$(date +%Y%m%d-%H%M)"
mkdir -p "$backup"
[ -d /etc/divvydrive ] && cp -a /etc/divvydrive "$backup/" || true
log "Upgrade: applying vendor patch"
if command -v apt-get >/dev/null 2>&1; then
sudo apt-get update -qq
sudo apt-get install -y --only-upgrade divvydrive
elif command -v dnf >/dev/null 2>&1; then
sudo dnf upgrade -y divvydrive
elif command -v yum >/dev/null 2>&1; then
sudo yum update -y divvydrive
fi
log "Verify: re-reading divvydrive version"
if command -v dpkg >/dev/null 2>&1; then
after=$(dpkg-query -W -f='${Version}' divvydrive)
else
after=$(rpm -q --qf '%{VERSION}-%{RELEASE}' divvydrive)
fi
log "After: $after"
if [ "$after" != "$current" ]; then
log "SUCCESS: divvydrive upgraded"
else
log "WARN: version unchanged. Confirm the patched build is in your repository."
exit 1
fi
After the upgrade, restart any service that loads the patched binary so the new code is actually running.
If you can't patch immediately
Patching is the only durable fix. These mitigations cut exposure while the change window is scheduled. They do not remove the vulnerability.
Web server / WAF rule (ModSecurity sample)
# Append to /etc/modsecurity/rules/local.conf and reload Apache.
SecRule REQUEST_URI "@rx (?:\.\./|%2e%2e/)" \
"id:900001,phase:1,deny,status:403,msg:'Path traversal attempt blocked'"
SecRule ARGS "@rx (?:union[\s/*]+select|select[\s/*]+.*from)" \
"id:900002,phase:2,deny,status:403,msg:'SQLi pattern blocked'"
sudo systemctl reload apache2 # or nginx
How to verify the fix worked
After applying the patched build, confirm the version string matches the fixed release named in the DivvyDrive Information Technologies Inc. advisory.
dpkg -s divvydrive | grep -i version # Debian / Ubuntu
rpm -q divvydrive # RHEL / Rocky
Run an authenticated vulnerability scan with a current signature set and confirm the scanner no longer flags CVE-2026-5791. For internet-facing deployments that were unpatched during the disclosure window, review logs for the affected endpoints over the full exposure period and rotate any credentials the vulnerable process could touch.
Frequently asked questions
Is CVE-2026-5791 being exploited in the wild?
At time of writing, CVE-2026-5791 is not on CISA's KEV list. Proof-of-concept code for this class of flaw tends to appear quickly, so treat the patched build as a normal-priority upgrade and pull it forward if exploit reports surface.
What is the CVSS score for CVE-2026-5791?
The CVSS base score is 6.5 (Medium). Full vector detail is on the NVD entry.
Will a firewall rule or WAF signature fully mitigate CVE-2026-5791?
No. Network-layer filters slow opportunistic scanners and block a subset of payloads, but a focused attacker who knows the bug will work around them. The vendor patch is the only durable fix.
Do I need to assume compromise if the affected service was internet-facing and unpatched?
Not automatically, but log review is cheap insurance. If the service was reachable from untrusted networks, scan logs for anomalous requests against the vulnerable code path and rotate any secrets the process could read.
References
- Official vendor advisory: https://siberguvenlik.gov.tr/guvenlik-bildirimleri/detay/tr-26-0182
- NVD entry: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-5791
- CISA KEV catalog: https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog
*Assembled from the official vendor advisory, the NVD record, and the CISA KEV catalog entry on 2026-05-25. Always confirm against the vendor advisory before applying changes in production.*