How to Fix CVE-2026-7272: Path Traversal in matlab-mcp-server
By Sai Kiran Pandrala
Related fixes
Other vulnerabilities in the same area that are worth patching alongside this one:
- How to Fix CVE-2026-44128: Improper neutralization of directives in dynamically evaluated code ('eval injec — Improper neutralization of directives in dynamically evaluated code ('eval injec
- How to Fix CVE-2026-32352: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') — Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')
- How to Fix CVE-2026-33356: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key in IoT Cloud MQTT Broker EMQX , Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key in IoT Cloud MQTT Broker EMQX
- How to Fix CVE-2026-32816: CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in admidio , CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in admidio
- How to Fix CVE-2026-23615: Critical Vulnerability in MailEssentials AI , Critical Vulnerability in MailEssentials AI
Last verified: 2026-05-25
CVE-2026-7272 is a path traversal in WilliamCloudQi matlab-mcp-server. Fix it by upgrading to the patched build from the vendor advisory.
| Severity | CVSS 6.9 - Medium |
|---|---|
| Actively exploited? | Not currently in the CISA KEV catalog |
| Affected | matlab-mcp-server ab88f6b9bf5f36f725e8628029f7f6dd0d9913ca |
| Fixed in | See vendor advisory |
| Type (CWE) | CWE-22: Path Traversal |
What is CVE-2026-7272?
CVE-2026-7272 is a path traversal flaw in WilliamCloudQi matlab-mcp-server. It carries a CVSS base score of 6.9 (medium). It is not currently listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.
From the source record: A flaw has been found in WilliamCloudQi matlab-mcp-server up to ab88f6b9bf5f36f725e8628029f7f6dd0d9913ca. The affected element is the function generate_matlab_code/execute_matlab_code of the file src/index.ts of the component MCP Interface. Executing a manipulation of the argument scriptPath can lead to path traversal. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
Why it matters in practice: The blast radius depends on how the affected service is exposed. An internet-facing instance with no compensating controls is the highest-risk configuration.
Am I affected?
You are affected if your installation of matlab-mcp-server matches a version listed in the Affected row above.
Check the running version against the Affected row above using the product's admin console or --version flag.
How to fix CVE-2026-7272
Apply the vendor patch. Target the build named in the Fixed in row above (See vendor advisory). The runnable command set below covers the most common deployment patterns for matlab-mcp-server.
Generic upgrade pattern
If the affected product is a Linux package, upgrade via the system package manager:
# Debian / Ubuntu
sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get upgrade -y
# RHEL / Rocky / Alma
sudo dnf upgrade --security -y
If it ships as a Windows installer, download the patched build from the vendor advisory and:
# Vendor advisory: https://vuldb.com/vuln/359927
Start-Process msiexec.exe -ArgumentList '/i <patched-installer>.msi /qn /norestart' -Wait
Get-ItemProperty HKLM:\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall\* | \
Where-Object DisplayName -match '<product-name>' | Select-Object DisplayName, DisplayVersion
After applying the patch
- Restart the service or device so the patched binary loads.
- Confirm the running version matches the Fixed in row using the verification command below.
- Rotate credentials and API keys that the affected service could access if the asset was exposed during the disclosure window.
If you can't patch immediately
Until the patch lands, narrow the attack surface with these runnable controls.
Restrict network exposure
Block public access to the affected service at the perimeter. Allow only trusted source IPs.
# Linux iptables: only allow trusted admin subnet
sudo iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 443 -s 10.10.10.0/24 -j ACCEPT
sudo iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 443 -j DROP
sudo iptables-save | sudo tee /etc/iptables/rules.v4
# Windows firewall: only allow trusted admin subnet on management port
New-NetFirewallRule -DisplayName "Restrict-Mgmt-Allow" -Direction Inbound -Action Allow `
-RemoteAddress 10.10.10.0/24 -Protocol TCP -LocalPort 443
New-NetFirewallRule -DisplayName "Restrict-Mgmt-Deny" -Direction Inbound -Action Block `
-Protocol TCP -LocalPort 443
Mitigations are temporary. Apply the vendor patch as soon as a maintenance window opens.
How to verify the fix worked
Confirm the patched build is the one actually running.
Check the running version against the Affected row above using the product's admin console or --version flag.
Expected: a version at or above the patched build named in the vendor advisory.
Also worth doing: pull recent log windows for indicators of compromise listed in the vendor advisory, and re-run an authenticated vulnerability scan with up-to-date signatures.
Frequently asked questions
Is CVE-2026-7272 being exploited in the wild?
As of 2026-05-25, CVE-2026-7272 is not listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. Watch the catalog and patch on a normal cadence; KEV status can change as exploitation evidence emerges.
What is the CVSS score for CVE-2026-7272?
The CVSS base score is 6.9 (Medium).
What version fixes this?
The vendor advisory names the patched build. See the References section.
Will a WAF or IDS rule alone close this?
No. Network filters cut down opportunistic scans but they do not remove the flaw. The vendor patch is the only durable fix.
References
- Official vendor advisory: https://vuldb.com/vuln/359927
- NVD entry: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-7272
- CISA KEV catalog: https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog
- Additional reference: https://vuldb.com/vuln/359927/cti
- Additional reference: https://vuldb.com/submit/802911
- Additional reference: https://github.com/WilliamCloudQi/matlab-mcp-server/issues/8
- Additional reference: https://github.com/BruceJqs/public_exp/issues/18
*Assembled from the official vendor advisory, the NVD record, and the CISA KEV listing on 2026-05-25. Always confirm against the vendor advisory before applying changes in production.*