How to Fix CVE-2026-7325: SSRF Vulnerability in Server
Related fixes
Other vulnerabilities in the same area that are worth patching alongside this one:
- How to Fix CVE-2026-28553: Permission issues in EMUI — Permission issues in EMUI
- How to Fix CVE-2026-4822: Command Injection in Iperius Backup — Command Injection in Iperius Backup
- How to Fix CVE-2026-32500: Critical Vulnerability in MetaMax , Critical Vulnerability in MetaMax
- How to Fix CVE-2026-27191: Open redirect in feathers , Open redirect in feathers
- How to Fix CVE-2026-6622: Cross-site scripting in ISP Billing Software , Cross-site scripting in ISP Billing Software
*By Sai Kiran Pandrala*
| Severity | Not verified - see advisory |
|---|---|
| Actively exploited? | Not currently listed in CISA KEV |
| Affected | 2026.1.6.0 <= 2026.1.16.0, 0 <= 2025.3.20.0 |
| Fixed in | See vendor advisory |
| Type (CWE) | CWE-918: Ssrf server side request forgery |
What is CVE-2026-7325?
CVE-2026-7325 is an server-side request forgery (SSRF) flaw in Server. The product makes server-side HTTP requests to attacker-controlled URLs, exposing internal services and cloud metadata endpoints. Vendor description: Improper authorization in the Active Directory browsing feature in Devolutions Server allows a low-privileged authenticated user to obtain authentication material associated with a stored PAM provider service account via authentication relay to an attacker-controlled server. This issue affects : * Devolutions Server 2026.1.6.0 through 2026.1.16.0 * Devolutions Server 2025.3.20.0 and earlier
Why this CVE matters
Server-side request forgery routinely chains into cloud-metadata theft, internal service enumeration, and credential exfiltration. In cloud-hosted deployments the impact is often more severe than on-prem because of the metadata service exposure.
For deployments of Server that have been exposed to the public internet during the disclosure window, the operating assumption should be that scanning has already happened. Even where exploitation has not been publicly observed, scanning for the vulnerable fingerprint is cheap and routine. Patching closes the door; log review and credential rotation close out the rest of the response.
Am I affected?
You are affected if your installation matches any of these version ranges:
- Server: 2026.1.6.0 <= 2026.1.16.0
- Server: 0 <= 2025.3.20.0
Check your installed version against the list above. If you cannot determine the version, treat the system as affected and follow the upgrade path below.
Open Server's About dialog or run the vendor-documented version-check command. Compare the result against the affected ranges in the advisory.
How to fix CVE-2026-7325
- Read the vendor advisory in full: https://devolutions.net/security/advisories/DEVO-2026-0013/
- Upgrade Server to the patched build listed in the vendor advisory.
- Back up the configuration (and database, where applicable) before upgrading.
- Apply the patch in a maintenance window. For HA pairs, upgrade the standby node first, fail over, then upgrade the former primary.
- Restart the affected service so the patched binary loads, then verify the new version (see verification section).
Linux package upgrade
The vendor advisory (https://devolutions.net/security/advisories/DEVO-2026-0013/) names the patched build as the build named in the vendor advisory (https://devolutions.net/security/advisories/DEVO-2026-0013/).
# Ubuntu / Debian
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install --only-upgrade server
dpkg -s server | grep -i version
# RHEL / Rocky / AlmaLinux / Fedora
sudo dnf upgrade --refresh server -y
rpm -q server
# openSUSE
sudo zypper refresh && sudo zypper update server
# Restart the service that loads the patched binary
sudo systemctl restart server 2>/dev/null || true
sudo systemctl status server --no-pager 2>/dev/null || true
# Vendor advisory: https://devolutions.net/security/advisories/DEVO-2026-0013/
# Container deployments: rebuild with the patched package layer, then roll the workload.
docker pull <your-registry>/server:<patched-tag>
docker stop <app> && docker rm <app>
docker run -d --name <app> <your-registry>/server:<patched-tag>
# Kubernetes
kubectl set image deployment/<deployment-name> server=<your-registry>/server:<patched-tag>
kubectl rollout status deployment/<deployment-name>
Verify the fix landed
# Vendor advisory: https://devolutions.net/security/advisories/DEVO-2026-0013/
# 1. Compare the running version against the fixed build named above.
# (Replace the version probe with the platform-specific command from the block above.)
# 2. Re-scan with your vulnerability scanner (Nessus, Qualys, Tenable, OpenVAS).
# The scanner should no longer flag this CVE on the patched target.
# 3. Inspect recent service / kernel logs for crash loops or rollback events.
journalctl -u <service> --since "10 minutes ago"
dmesg --since "10 minutes ago"
If you cannot patch immediately
Block outbound network access from the affected service to internal subnets and cloud metadata endpoints (e.g. 169.254.169.254). Apply the patched build.
How to verify the fix worked
- After applying the patch, verify the running version in the product's admin UI or via the vendor-documented CLI command.
- Confirm the patched build matches the version listed in the vendor advisory.
- Run an authenticated vulnerability scan with a current signature set and confirm the scanner no longer flags CVE-2026-7325.
- Review logs for the entire pre-patch window for indicators of compromise listed in the vendor or CISA advisory.
- Confirm any network-layer mitigations that were applied as a stopgap have been reverted (or left in place intentionally) once the patch is verified.
If your installation was internet-reachable during the disclosure window, treat log review as part of the remediation rather than an optional follow-up. Look for unusually long URI paths containing traversal sequences, unexpectedly large responses from the affected endpoint, and outbound requests from the application to internal addresses or cloud-metadata endpoints. Treat any sensitive file the bug could disclose as exposed.
Frequently asked questions
Is CVE-2026-7325 being exploited in the wild?
Public exploitation has not been confirmed by CISA at the time of writing. Treat the patch as time-sensitive anyway; reports often lag actual abuse.
Will a WAF or IDS rule fully mitigate CVE-2026-7325?
No. Network-layer filters can reduce noise and slow opportunistic scanners, but they will not stop a determined attacker. The vendor patch is the only durable fix.
How long should I plan for the upgrade?
Typical vendor-documented upgrade windows for Server run from a few minutes to under an hour depending on cluster size. Test in a staging environment first and follow the vendor's documented HA upgrade order.
References
- Official vendor advisory: https://devolutions.net/security/advisories/DEVO-2026-0013/
- NVD entry: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-7325
- CISA KEV catalog: https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog
*This guide was assembled from the official vendor advisory, the NVD record, and the CISA KEV catalog entry on 2026-05-25. Always confirm against the vendor advisory before applying changes in production.*