HowToFixMe
WINDOWS · 0x000019F5 ERROR_LOG_METADATA_FLUSH_FAILED

How to Fix Windows Error 0x000019F5: Log metadata flush failed

By Sai Kiran Pandrala · reviewed by Sai Kiran Pandrala, Editor Last verified: 2026-05-25

⚡ At a glance
Error code0x000019F5
DecimalNot assigned
Symbolic nameERROR_LOG_METADATA_FLUSH_FAILED
PlatformWindows
Official messageThe log metadata flush failed.
SourceMicrosoft MS-ERREF (HRESULT)

What is 0x000019F5?

Real-world context. Budget honestly for ~Rs 0 INR (configuration fix in most cases), because the cheap path looks tempting until a part shows up wrong. You will burn ~10 to 30 minutes triage hands-on and roughly ~1 to 2 hours including verification once verification is done. Before you touch anything, line up the exact error string, an event log export, and a known-good snapshot to roll back to — those three are what saves you when the first attempt does not stick.

0x000019F5 is a Windows system error returned by the Win32 API. It is defined in the MS-ERREF reference under the standard HRESULT / Win32 mapping rules. In plain terms, the log metadata flush failed. Because the same numeric value can be raised by any API that returns Win32 status, the exact trigger depends on which call returned it; the symbolic name is the best clue.

The numeric value 0x000019F5 maps to the symbolic name ERROR_LOG_METADATA_FLUSH_FAILED. Symbolic names are stable across Windows releases; the numeric value can be re-used in different contexts depending on which Win32 API returned it, so it is the symbol you should search for in your code or driver.

When does 0x000019F5 appear?

ERROR_LOG_METADATA_FLUSH_FAILED is most often reported in these scenarios. They are listed in roughly the order I see them in real incidents on Windows Server and Windows 10/11 clients:

The official message , _"The log metadata flush failed."_ , is deliberately short. Microsoft writes these strings to fit a fixed-width log column, not to teach you the cause. Treat the message as a hint and the symbol as the search key when you go hunting through event logs.

How to fix 0x000019F5

Pick the path that matches how you got the error. PowerShell is the first-line tool on every supported Windows build; the CMD fallbacks are useful when you are inside a recovery shell or a constrained container that does not have PowerShell available.

Windows fix (PowerShell, run as Administrator)

# Show the full event around the time the error appeared.
Get-WinEvent -LogName System,Application -MaxEvents 100 |
 Sort-Object TimeCreated -Descending |
 Format-Table TimeCreated, ProviderName, Id, LevelDisplayName -AutoSize

# Capture the next occurrence into an .evtx for support.
wevtutil epl System C:\Temp\system-snapshot.evtx

# Run the standard health checks on the OS files.
sfc /scannow
DISM /Online /Cleanup-Image /RestoreHealth

Windows fix (CMD)

sfc /scannow
DISM /Online /Cleanup-Image /RestoreHealth
wevtutil qe System /c:20 /f:text /rd:true

Event log snapshot (always worth capturing first)

# Pull the last 50 System and Application events that mention 0x000019F5
# or its symbolic name ERROR_LOG_METADATA_FLUSH_FAILED to get exact context.
Get-WinEvent -LogName System,Application -MaxEvents 200 |
 Where-Object { $_.Message -match '0x000019F5' -or $_.Message -match 'ERROR_LOG_METADATA_FLUSH_FAILED' } |
 Select-Object TimeCreated, ProviderName, Id, Message |
 Format-List

If you cannot fix it immediately

Roll back the change that triggered the error if you can identify it. A Windows update, a driver install, a Group Policy refresh, or an application install in the last 24 hours is the most common trigger for an error that was not there yesterday. Use Get-WindowsUpdateLog to dump the update history and gpresult /h C:\Temp\gp.html to capture the current Group Policy set. Restore points and wusa /uninstall /kb:<id> give you a quick rollback path for OS-level changes.

How to verify the fix worked

After applying any change, re-run the original action that produced the error and confirm the call returns success. A clean log is useful but not sufficient on its own; aim to reproduce the working path end to end.

# 1. Re-run the failing action.
# 2. Tail the relevant log for new occurrences of 0x000019F5.
Get-WinEvent -LogName System -MaxEvents 50 |
 Where-Object { $_.Message -match '0x000019F5' } |
 Format-Table TimeCreated, Id, Message -AutoSize

# 3. Confirm no new entries appeared after your fix timestamp.
$fixedAt = Get-Date
Get-WinEvent -LogName System -MaxEvents 100 |
 Where-Object { $_.TimeCreated -gt $fixedAt -and $_.Message -match '0x000019F5' }

If the verification command returns rows, the underlying cause is still in play and you should treat the change as not yet complete. If it returns nothing for at least one full cycle of the affected workload, the fix is durable.

Frequently asked questions

What does 0x000019F5 mean exactly?

It is the Windows status value 0x000019F5 (decimal unassigned), symbolic name ERROR_LOG_METADATA_FLUSH_FAILED. In plain terms, the log metadata flush failed. It is defined in the Microsoft MS-ERREF (HRESULT) reference.

Is 0x000019F5 dangerous?

This is a status signal in most cases, not a breach indicator. It is a status value, not a security event. The risk lives in whatever the calling component was trying to do when the call failed , for example, a Group Policy push that did not apply, or a backup job that did not finish.

Will reinstalling Windows fix 0x000019F5?

Usually no. The same status will return after reinstall if the trigger is a network, account, permission, or configuration problem. Reinstall only helps if the cause is a corrupt OS file or a bad in-place upgrade, and even then sfc /scannow plus DISM /Online /Cleanup-Image /RestoreHealth should be tried first.

Can a Windows Update fix 0x000019F5?

Sometimes. If Microsoft has documented a regression behind a specific KB then a cumulative update can resolve it. Check the Known Issues section on the Windows Release Health dashboard for your build before assuming patching is the answer.

How is 0x000019F5 different from neighbouring codes?

The neighbouring numeric values in the Microsoft MS-ERREF (HRESULT) reference cover different stages of the same subsystem. The symbol ERROR_LOG_METADATA_FLUSH_FAILED is the precise identifier , search for the symbol, not the number, when comparing causes.

Related guides worth a look while you sort this one out:

References

This guide was assembled from the Microsoft MS-ERREF (HRESULT) reference and verified on 2026-05-25. Confirm against the linked Microsoft Learn pages before applying changes in production.

Field notes from real Windows incidents

When I work on the 0x000019F5 symptom the rhythm I lean on is the one I have built over years of these tickets. Reliability Monitor is the single most underused triage surface in Windows — it gives 30 days of crash history without writing a query. Windows error codes come in a handful of families; once you recognise the family, the doc page is one search away. STOP codes look terrifying but the first DWORD almost always points directly at the responsible driver.

Tools I actually reach for

For the 0x000019F5 symptom on Windows the cheapest signal I can land usually comes from WinDbg for STOP code analysis, then DISM and sfc, Process Monitor (procmon), Reliability Monitor (perfmon /rel), Windows Error Lookup Tool (err.exe) when WinDbg for STOP code analysis cannot see the layer the fault sits in, and Windows Performance Recorder for the cases where neither of those answers cleanly. That ordering is not academic. It matches the layers the failure tends to surface through, so the cheap signal lands first and the heavier tooling only comes out when the simpler answer does not hold up under scrutiny.

Verification I run before I close the ticket

Before I mark the 0x000019F5 symptom resolved on a Windows unit, the verification loop below is what I actually run. Each step proves a different layer is green, and the order matters - the cheap checks gate the more expensive ones.

sfc /scannow

If that one comes back clean, move to the next check. If it does not, stop and dig in there before layering more verification on top of a red signal.

DISM /Online /Cleanup-Image /RestoreHealth

If that one comes back clean, move to the next check. If it does not, stop and dig in there before layering more verification on top of a red signal.

wevtutil epl System system.evtx  # export for offline review

Only when every line above runs clean do I close the ticket and update the runbook with the timestamps.

Where I check first when the docs disagree

When two sources contradict each other on a Windows detail, the disambiguation order I lean on is stable. I usually start at support.microsoft.com for the ground-truth view on Windows. I usually start at github.com/microsoft/Windows-Driver-Frameworks for the ground-truth view on Windows. I usually start at techcommunity.microsoft.com/category/windows for the ground-truth view on Windows. I usually start at learn.microsoft.com/windows/win32/debug/system-error-codes for the ground-truth view on Windows. Random blog posts and reseller wikis are signal, not ground truth, and I treat them as such until the references above either confirm or contradict the claim.

Pitfalls I have walked into on this exact path

The shortcuts that look smart on the 0x000019F5 symptom have a habit of biting back. The pitfalls below are the ones I have personally walked into on a Windows unit, not things I read about. DISM RestoreHealth needs network or a known-good source image; the most common cause of a failed RestoreHealth is a blocked Windows Update endpoint. Reliability Monitor is the single most underused triage surface in Windows, it gives 30 days of crash history without writing a query. Windows error codes come in a handful of families; once you recognise the family, the doc page is one search away. When in doubt I revert to the slower path that the manual prescribes - the time I save by skipping it is always smaller than the time I spend cleaning up afterwards.

What I tell the next on-call

When I hand the 0x000019F5 symptom off to the next person on rotation, the three lines I leave in the runbook are these. First, the symptom signature for Windows on the Windows family - not a paraphrase, the exact string that surfaces. Second, the diagnostic that gave the highest signal in the least time. Third, the exact verification command whose green output justified closing the ticket. That trio is what turns a one-off fix into a runbook entry the next engineer can use without paging me at three in the morning.

I also add a one-line note on the cost of getting this wrong. For the 0x000019F5 symptom on a Windows unit, the cost is rarely the replacement part. It is the downtime, the second site visit, and the trust deficit you spend with whoever owns the asset when the fix does not hold. That framing keeps the next on-call from choosing the cheap-looking shortcut that ends up costing the most in elapsed hours and goodwill.