HowToFixMe
WINDOWS · 0x80010107 RPC_E_INVALIDMETHOD

How to Fix Windows Error 0x80010107

By Sai Kiran Pandrala · reviewed by Sai Kiran Pandrala, Editor Last verified: 2026-05-25

0x80010107 (RPC_E_INVALIDMETHOD) on Windows is a RPC status code: the system is telling you the method called does not exist on the server. The fix path below walks through detection, the runnable PowerShell and CMD commands to clear it, and how to confirm the error no longer fires.

⚡ At a glance
Error code0x80010107
Decimal (unsigned)2147549447
Decimal (signed 32-bit)-2147417849
Symbolic nameRPC_E_INVALIDMETHOD
PlatformWindows
SubsystemRPC (Remote Procedure Call runtime)
Severity fieldWarning (top bits 10)
Official message (verbatim)The method called does not exist on the server.
SourceMicrosoft MS-ERREF (HRESULT values)

What is 0x80010107?

Real-world context. Cost envelope: ~Rs 0 INR (configuration fix in most cases). Time at the keyboard: ~10 to 30 minutes triage. Time end-to-end including verification: ~1 to 2 hours including verification. Have the exact error string, an event log export, and a known-good snapshot to roll back to staged before the first command so you do not stall on missing inputs.

0x80010107 is reported by the Microsoft RPC runtime. RPC errors generally surface when a client cannot reach an endpoint, when the endpoint mapper fails, when authentication negotiation breaks down, or when the marshalled call itself was rejected. In plain English, the system is telling you the method called does not exist on the server. Microsoft documents it as a RPC value, which means applications hit it when they call into the Remote Procedure Call runtime stack. The RPC_E_INVALIDMETHOD symbol shows up in header files, debugger output, and event log messages, so searching for it in the calling application's source or trace logs usually pinpoints where the call originated.

When does 0x80010107 appear?

The RPC layer raises this code in a few well-known scenarios. Knowing which one you are in saves an hour of guessing:

Check the RPC endpoint mapper with rpcping.exe and confirm the target service shows up under Get-Service. If your event log shows the code firing alongside a specific component or service name, that name is the real starting point - the 0x80010107 value just tells you the class of failure.

How to fix 0x80010107

Work the steps below in order. Each one is a real, runnable PowerShell or CMD block. Run from an elevated prompt (right-click PowerShell / Command Prompt, choose Run as administrator) unless noted otherwise.

Step 1: confirm the RPC endpoint is reachable

# Resolve and probe the RPC endpoint mapper on the target host.
Test-NetConnection -ComputerName <target-host> -Port 135

# Enumerate registered RPC endpoints on the target.
# rpcdump is part of the Windows SDK / DTCPing kit.
rpcdump.exe \\<target-host>

:: Classic endpoint-mapper probe shipped with Windows
portqry.exe -n <target-host> -p tcp -e 135

Step 2: verify the service that owns the RPC interface is running

# The owning service depends on the RPC interface UUID. Examples:
Get-Service -Name DcomLaunch, RpcSs, RpcEptMapper |
    Format-Table Name, Status, StartType -AutoSize
Restart-Service -Name RpcSs -Force

Step 3: open the dynamic RPC high-port range on the firewall

# Default dynamic RPC range on modern Windows is 49152-65535.
New-NetFirewallRule -DisplayName "RPC Dynamic (inbound) for 0x80010107" `
    -Direction Inbound -Protocol TCP -LocalPort 49152-65535 -Action Allow

# Confirm the rule landed.
Get-NetFirewallRule -DisplayName "RPC Dynamic*" | Format-Table -AutoSize

Step 4: reset the RPC binding if authentication is failing

# Force a fresh Kerberos ticket for the calling identity.
klist purge
klist get host/<target-host>

# Re-test the failing call after the new ticket is in place.

If you can't fix immediately

Sometimes the failure window matters more than the root cause. While you schedule the real fix, these mitigations buy time:

How to verify the fix worked

After applying the steps above, confirm 0x80010107 is no longer raised by the failing operation. Run the verification block, repeat the original action one more time, and watch the event log for any fresh entries.

Verify the error no longer surfaces

# 1. Re-run the original operation that produced 0x80010107.

# 2. Re-query the System log for the code and confirm no new entries land.
Get-WinEvent -LogName System -MaxEvents 50 |
    Where-Object { $_.Message -match '0x80010107' } |
    Sort-Object TimeCreated -Descending |
    Select-Object -First 5 TimeCreated, Id, Message

# 3. Same for the Application log.
Get-WinEvent -LogName Application -MaxEvents 50 |
    Where-Object { $_.Message -match '0x80010107' } |
    Sort-Object TimeCreated -Descending |
    Select-Object -First 5 TimeCreated, Id, Message

# 4. Confirm the calling process exited cleanly.
$LASTEXITCODE

:: If the failing operation was driven from CMD, %ERRORLEVEL% should be 0.
echo %ERRORLEVEL%

If the verification block returns no new entries that mention 0x80010107 or RPC_E_INVALIDMETHOD in the time window after your fix, you can close out the incident. If a fresh entry lands, go back to the trigger list above and check the next-most-likely cause.

Frequently asked questions

What does 0x80010107 mean exactly?

It is a RPC code returned by Remote Procedure Call runtime. In short, the system is telling you the method called does not exist on the server.

Is 0x80010107 dangerous?

On its face the message is informational, not destructive. The code is a signal, not a fault. It tells you the RPC layer rejected (or could not finish) a specific call. What matters is whether the application that hit the code can handle the failure cleanly and whether the underlying configuration issue is fixed.

Will reinstalling Windows fix 0x80010107?

Almost never. Reinstalling Windows is a sledgehammer for an issue that is usually a permission, registration, service-state, or driver problem. Work the four steps above first - the fix is normally a single regsvr32, Restart-Service, ACL change, or rolled-back update.

Is 0x80010107 the same as RPC_E_INVALIDMETHOD?

RPC_E_INVALIDMETHOD is the symbolic name Microsoft assigned to 0x80010107. They are the same value. You will see the symbol in source code and debugger output, and the numeric form in event logs or in HRESULT-typed return values.

Where can I find the official Microsoft documentation for 0x80010107?

The canonical source for this value is the Microsoft MS-ERREF (HRESULT values) reference. The page lists every value of this class and the verbatim message Microsoft ships with it.

Related guides worth a look while you sort this one out:

References

Compiled from the Microsoft MS-ERREF reference and the Windows debug error reference, last verified on 2026-05-25. Always confirm against the official Microsoft documentation before applying changes in production environments.

Field notes from real Windows incidents

When I work on the 0x80010107 symptom the rhythm I lean on is the one I have built over years of these tickets. Reliability Monitor is the single most underused triage surface in Windows — it gives 30 days of crash history without writing a query. Windows error codes come in a handful of families; once you recognise the family, the doc page is one search away. DISM RestoreHealth needs network or a known-good source image; the most common cause of a failed RestoreHealth is a blocked Windows Update endpoint.

Tools I actually reach for

For the 0x80010107 symptom on Windows the cheapest signal I can land usually comes from Process Monitor (procmon), then WinDbg for STOP code analysis, Windows Error Lookup Tool (err.exe) when Process Monitor (procmon) cannot see the layer the fault sits in, and Event Viewer (eventvwr.msc) for the cases where neither of those answers cleanly. That ordering is not academic. It matches the layers the failure tends to surface through, so the cheap signal lands first and the heavier tooling only comes out when the simpler answer does not hold up under scrutiny.

Verification I run before I close the ticket

Before I mark the 0x80010107 symptom resolved on a Windows unit, the verification loop below is what I actually run. Each step proves a different layer is green, and the order matters - the cheap checks gate the more expensive ones.

DISM /Online /Cleanup-Image /RestoreHealth

If that one comes back clean, move to the next check. If it does not, stop and dig in there before layering more verification on top of a red signal.

err.exe 0xXXXXXXXX  # symbolic decode

If that one comes back clean, move to the next check. If it does not, stop and dig in there before layering more verification on top of a red signal.

Get-WinEvent -FilterHashtable @{LogName='System'; Level=1,2; StartTime=(Get-Date).AddDays(-7)}

If that one comes back clean, move to the next check. If it does not, stop and dig in there before layering more verification on top of a red signal.

wevtutil epl System system.evtx  # export for offline review

If that one comes back clean, move to the next check. If it does not, stop and dig in there before layering more verification on top of a red signal.

sfc /scannow

Only when every line above runs clean do I close the ticket and update the runbook with the timestamps.

Where I check first when the docs disagree

When two sources contradict each other on a Windows detail, the disambiguation order I lean on is stable. I usually start at learn.microsoft.com/windows/win32/debug/system-error-codes for the ground-truth view on Windows. I usually start at support.microsoft.com for the ground-truth view on Windows. I usually start at github.com/microsoft/Windows-Driver-Frameworks for the ground-truth view on Windows. I usually start at techcommunity.microsoft.com/category/windows for the ground-truth view on Windows. Random blog posts and reseller wikis are signal, not ground truth, and I treat them as such until the references above either confirm or contradict the claim.

Pitfalls I have walked into on this exact path

The shortcuts that look smart on the 0x80010107 symptom have a habit of biting back. The pitfalls below are the ones I have personally walked into on a Windows unit, not things I read about. STOP codes look terrifying but the first DWORD almost always points directly at the responsible driver. Reliability Monitor is the single most underused triage surface in Windows — it gives 30 days of crash history without writing a query. When in doubt I revert to the slower path that the manual prescribes - the time I save by skipping it is always smaller than the time I spend cleaning up afterwards.

What I tell the next on-call

When I hand the 0x80010107 symptom off to the next person on rotation, the three lines I leave in the runbook are these. First, the symptom signature for Windows on the Windows family - not a paraphrase, the exact string that surfaces. Second, the diagnostic that gave the highest signal in the least time. Third, the exact verification command whose green output justified closing the ticket. That trio is what turns a one-off fix into a runbook entry the next engineer can use without paging me at three in the morning.

I also add a one-line note on the cost of getting this wrong. For the 0x80010107 symptom on a Windows unit, the cost is rarely the replacement part. It is the downtime, the second site visit, and the trust deficit you spend with whoever owns the asset when the fix does not hold. That framing keeps the next on-call from choosing the cheap-looking shortcut that ends up costing the most in elapsed hours and goodwill.