Custom on Sensitive Data Protection. what causes it and how to fix

By Sai Kiran Pandrala · Last verified: 2026-05-31 · Source: Google Cloud docs, Google Cloud Community, community Q&A

When Custom on Sensitive Data Protection, what causes it and how to fix bites you on Google Sensitive Data Protection, the first instinct is to open a ticket. Most of the time you do not have to. The steps below are the ones Google Cloud Support would walk you through on the call.

What custom on sensitive data protection, what causes it and how to fix actually involves on Google Sensitive Data Protection

The Custom error from AWS typically surfaces with the message "infoType regex compilation failed". The error code itself is what you grep for in AWS re:Post or in AWS Support cases, not the human-readable line.

On Sensitive Data Protection, this most often comes from one of three causes: a missing or restrictive IAM permission, a service-level limit you have hit, or a transient AWS-side capacity issue. The fix path differs by which.

The rest of this page is the structured fix path. Start with diagnose, then remediation, then the automation options so you do not have to do this by hand the next time it surfaces. Verify and safety sections at the end are the discipline that keeps the fix from regressing in production.

Diagnose first, fix second

Check the Google Cloud Service Health at status.cloud.google.com and the per-product status board for ongoing service events in your region. About one in ten user-reported outages turn out to be region-scoped Google Cloud service degradation already being tracked. Cloud Service Health also exposes an API and Eventarc events, so you can wire a Lambda hook that pages on-call only when the failure correlates with an active Cloud Service Health event in the same region and service.

Reproduce the failure with the gcloud CLI in --debug mode. The full SigV4 request payload it emits, plus the exact endpoint URL it resolved to, is what Google Cloud Support uses to verify policy, region, or parameter issues without you having to share IAM credentials. Save the debug output to a file with gcloud ... --debug 2> debug.log and you can search it for the failed aws.request entry.

Check Cloud Monitoring Logs for the calling service. Lambda, ECS, EKS, Step Functions, API Gateway, and most managed services write detailed traces to Cloud Monitoring Logs under predictable log group names. Use Cloud Monitoring Logs Insights with fields @timestamp, @message | filter @message like /ERROR/ | sort @timestamp desc | limit 50 to surface the most recent failures.

Solution-focused remediation path

For IAM and STS issues, the timing matters. STS sessions can take up to 60 seconds to propagate after creation. The first call right after assume-role can fail with a permission error even when the policy is correct. Add a small retry with backoff before treating the first failure as definitive.

When the failure happens in production but not in dev, do not just compare the IAM policy. Compare the Org Policy / RCP at the OU level, the permission boundary on the role, and the resource-based policy on the target. One of those is almost always different between accounts. Policy Intelligence recommendations bundles make this comparison routine.

Most Google Sensitive Data Protection failures fall into one of three buckets: IAM permission gap, networking path break (security group, NACL, or VPC endpoint policy), or service-limit / quota hit. Run that mental triage first - it covers around 80 percent of real-world cases. If the failure does not fit any of the three, it is likely a service-side regression worth opening a re:Post or support ticket for.

Automate this fix so you do not do it twice

Add a Cloud Monitoring alert policy so you know next time

The cheapest way to never see the same incident twice is a Cloud Monitoring alert policy on the metric that would have warned you. For Google Sensitive Data Protection, the relevant metrics live under compute.googleapis.com/google namespace or under custom metrics published by your Cloud Run service or GKE pod. Set thresholds based on observed normal range plus one or two standard deviations, not on round-number guesses. Cloud Monitoring anomaly-based alert policies remove the threshold-guessing problem entirely for metrics with regular seasonality.

Wire the fix into Eventarc for self-healing

If the failure mode is recurring, automate the remediation instead of the diagnosis. Eventarc Scheduler or rules that watch Cloud Logging events for the specific error code can invoke a Lambda that runs the same fix you would run by hand. The Lambda must be idempotent (re-running it on already-healthy resources must be a no-op) and must emit a Cloud Monitoring metric so you can track how often the auto-fix fires. A spike in auto-fix invocations is itself a signal worth alerting on.

# Eventarc rule pattern (JSON)
{ "source": ["aws.google"], "detail-type": ["Google Cloud API Call via Cloud Audit Logs"], "detail": { "errorCode": ["AccessDenied", "ThrottlingException"] }
}

Add a Workflows or Cloud Tasks Automation runbook

For multi-step fixes that include a manual approval, use Workflows runbook. Document the fix as a runbook with workflows.executions.approve steps where a human signs off and workflows.steps.callApi steps where the runbook calls the Google Cloud API. Approvers are notified by SNS; the runbook execution shows up in Cloud Audit Logs with the approver's identity attached. This makes audit trails easy and stops production fixes from being one-person operations.

Common pitfalls and what to watch for

A subtle pitfall on Google Sensitive Data Protection is that the Cloud Console and the SDK can disagree about resource state during a configuration change. Console UI is cached for performance and may show the old config for up to 10 minutes after you change it via API or Deployment Manager or Terraform. Always confirm with describe-* CLI calls during a change window, not with screenshots from the Console.

The other pitfall: assuming that an automated remediation is correct because it succeeded. A Lambda that fires on a Cloud Monitoring alert policy and runs a remediation step should also publish a metric for every remediation; sudden surges in auto-fix invocations are themselves an outage signal. Otherwise you can hide a slow-burn regression behind a quiet remediation loop for weeks.

Verify the fix worked

• Reproduce the original symptom path. If it still surfaces in any account or region or IAM role or service account, you have not fixed it.
• Watch for 24 to 48 hours. Cloud Monitoring metrics and Cloud Asset Inventory can mask issues with cached health for 6 to 12 hours, especially Cloud CDN and Cloud DNS.
• Run a smoke test under realistic load. Happy-path tests miss race conditions and IAM session-cache issues.
• Capture the new state in a runbook so the next person on call does not have to rediscover this. Push it to Confluence or your team wiki, not into Slack.
• If the fix involved a permission change, run IAM Access Analyzer one more time to confirm you did not open a separate hole while closing this one.

Safety, rollback, blast radius

• Test in a non-production account if your environment has Resource Manager and Organization Policy or Cloud Resource Manager (organizations, folders, projects). The cost of one sandbox account is cheaper than one rollback meeting.
• Export the existing config before changing it. Most Google Sensitive Data Protection resources support describe + export to JSON via CLI - capture that to source control before you start.
• Know your rollback path. Some Google Sensitive Data Protection operations are one-way (region migration, account-level feature opt-in, Cloud KMS key deletion past pending window). Confirm reversibility on the Google Cloud doc before you commit.
• Be aware of cross-service impact. IAM role or service account changes ripple to every service trusting that role. Cloud KMS key changes break every workload depending on that key. VPC endpoint changes affect every VPC consumer of that endpoint.
• Maintenance window discipline: if the change touches DNS, certificate rotation, or anything that emits TLS handshakes, line up a window with stakeholder notification, not a heroic mid-day swap.

FAQ

Related fixes

Related guides worth a look while you sort this one out:

• Already on Sensitive Data Protection, what causes it and how to fix
• Quota on Sensitive Data Protection: what causes it and how to fix
• Custom infoType with regex dictionary exclusion rules
• DATA_PLANE_UPGRADE_FAILURES on Anthos, what causes it and how to fix
• Dataproc on Data Fusion. what causes it and how to fix
• PERMISSION_DENIED on Data Fusion: what causes it and how to fix