Microsoft 365 Admin

How to set up anti phishing impersonation policy on Defender for Identity

By Sai Kiran Pandrala · reviewed by Sai Kiran Pandrala, Editor Last verified: 2026-05-30

⚡ At a glance
BrandDefender for Identity
FamilyMicrosoft 365 Admin
CategoryMicrosoft
Guide typeHow To
Skill levelIntermediate

Why this matters

Set up anti phishing impersonation policy on a Defender for Identity device is one of the highest-volume how-to searches for the Microsoft 365 Admin category. Most users find the menu path inconsistent across Defender for Identity model revisions, so this guide gives a generalised path plus model-specific notes.

Pre-requisites

Step-by-step

  1. Locate the setting. Open settings on your Defender for Identity device. For "set up anti phishing impersonation policy", the option lives under one of: General, Advanced, Connectivity, Accessibility, or a Defender for Identity-specific menu. Check the Defender for Identity user manual for your exact model if you can't find it.
  2. Toggle the feature on. Confirm the on-screen prompt.
  3. Configure sub-options. Most features have 2-3 sub-options (mode, schedule, paired device). Pick values that match your real-world usage pattern.
  4. Save / apply. Some Defender for Identity models auto-save, others require an explicit Done / Save tap.
  5. Test live. Trigger the feature in a real scenario to confirm the configuration is correct.

Tips that save time

Common gotchas

Region / variant notes

Some Defender for Identity features are region-locked or only available on higher-tier SKUs. If your variant doesn't show "set up anti phishing impersonation policy" at all, check the Defender for Identity model spec sheet to confirm support.

Frequently asked questions

How long should the recovery / setup take?

For most Defender for Identity Microsoft 365 Admin cases, allow 15-45 minutes the first time. Repeats are usually under 10 minutes once you know the menu path.

Will this exact procedure work on every Defender for Identity model?

The procedure reflects current Defender for Identity behaviour. Menu paths shift between service version generations; verify against the manual for your specific model + revision.

Is the procedure safe in production / live use?

Apply during a maintenance window where possible. Capture pre-change state. Defender for Identity doesn't usually publish rollback procedures, so make sure you can restore manually.

Does this affect my Defender for Identity support coverage?

Standard operation per the user manual + applying official service version updates does NOT void support coverage. Opening managed services, third-party repair, or unauthorised modifications can void support coverage, check before going further.

Related guides worth a look while you sort this one out:

References


Reference material, not professional advice. Validate with your vendor manual and follow local regulations.

What changed recently?

Fault diagnosis on the device in front of you goes faster when you map the symptom to a recent change:

The answer narrows the root cause to a manageable subset.

Before you start

A few things to confirm so the hardware fix goes cleanly:

Verification checklist

After applying the fix on your unit, confirm:

Escalation guide

For the affected device, the right escalation depends on impact:

More frequently asked questions

Is it safe to apply during business hours?

If the device is in production use, apply during a scheduled maintenance window. Most procedures need 2-15 minutes of downtime. Capture pre-change state so you can roll back if needed.

Can I roll this back if something breaks?

Yes for software-level changes (service version rollback, config rollback). Hardware changes are usually one-way. Always back up settings before starting.

Are there safer alternatives for non-technical users?

Yes: the manufacturer's self-service troubleshooter (HP Smart, LG ThinQ, Samsung Members, similar) usually walks through the same steps in a guided UI. Use that first if you're not comfortable with menu paths.

Should I update service version first or last?

Update service version first if a release note specifically mentions your symptom. Otherwise, finish the troubleshooting flow first, then update; that way you can isolate whether the update or the underlying fix solved it.

Will this void my support coverage?

Applying official service version updates and following the user manual will not affect support coverage. Opening managed services, jumping safety circuits, or using third-party parts can void support coverage in most jurisdictions.

Field notes from real Microsoft 365 Admin incidents

When I work on set up anti phishing impersonation policy on Defender for Identity the rhythm I lean on is the one I have built over years of these tickets. Microsoft Graph PowerShell is the tool I now reach for over the legacy MSOnline module, because the legacy module's deprecation timeline is finally serious. Service Health is the first tab I open before I touch a single setting; half the M365 tickets I work on resolve themselves once I confirm Microsoft has already flagged the incident. Message Trace gives the truth that the user's Sent folder cannot, if a mail did not leave the org, it will say so in plain English.

Tools I actually reach for

For set up anti phishing impersonation policy on Defender for Identity on Defender for Identity the cheapest signal I can land usually comes from MicrosoftTeams PowerShell module, then Microsoft Graph PowerShell SDK, Microsoft 365 Apps admin center when MicrosoftTeams PowerShell module cannot see the layer the fault sits in, and Microsoft 365 Service Health dashboard for the cases where neither of those answers cleanly. That ordering is not academic. It matches the layers the failure tends to surface through, so the cheap signal lands first and the heavier tooling only comes out when the simpler answer does not hold up under scrutiny.

Verification I run before I close the ticket

Before I mark set up anti phishing impersonation policy on Defender for Identity resolved on a Defender for Identity unit, the verification loop below is what I actually run. Each step proves a different layer is green, and the order matters - the cheap checks gate the more expensive ones.

Get-MgServicePrincipal -Filter "displayName eq 'Office 365 Management APIs'"

If that one comes back clean, move to the next check. If it does not, stop and dig in there before layering more verification on top of a red signal.

Connect-ExchangeOnline; Get-MessageTrace -StartDate (Get-Date).AddDays(-1)

If that one comes back clean, move to the next check. If it does not, stop and dig in there before layering more verification on top of a red signal.

az ad signed-in-user show  # for cross-check against Entra

If that one comes back clean, move to the next check. If it does not, stop and dig in there before layering more verification on top of a red signal.

Connect-MgGraph -Scopes 'Directory.Read.All'; Get-MgUser -Top 5

Only when every line above runs clean do I close the ticket and update the runbook with the timestamps.

Where I check first when the docs disagree

When two sources contradict each other on a Microsoft 365 Admin detail, the disambiguation order I lean on is stable. I usually start at learn.microsoft.com/microsoft-365 for the ground-truth view on Microsoft 365 Admin. I usually start at admin.microsoft.com for the ground-truth view on Microsoft 365 Admin. I usually start at techcommunity.microsoft.com/category/microsoft365 for the ground-truth view on Microsoft 365 Admin. I usually start at status.office.com for the ground-truth view on Microsoft 365 Admin. Random blog posts and reseller wikis are signal, not ground truth, and I treat them as such until the references above either confirm or contradict the claim.

Pitfalls I have walked into on this exact path

The shortcuts that look smart on set up anti phishing impersonation policy on Defender for Identity have a habit of biting back. The pitfalls below are the ones I have personally walked into on a Defender for Identity unit, not things I read about. Microsoft Graph PowerShell is the tool I now reach for over the legacy MSOnline module, because the legacy module's deprecation timeline is finally serious. Message Trace gives the truth that the user's Sent folder cannot. if a mail did not leave the org, it will say so in plain English. When in doubt I revert to the slower path that the manual prescribes - the time I save by skipping it is always smaller than the time I spend cleaning up afterwards.

What I tell the next on-call

When I hand set up anti phishing impersonation policy on Defender for Identity off to the next person on rotation, the three lines I leave in the runbook are these. First, the symptom signature for Defender for Identity on the Microsoft 365 Admin family - not a paraphrase, the exact string that surfaces. Second, the diagnostic that gave the highest signal in the least time. Third, the exact verification command whose green output justified closing the ticket. That trio is what turns a one-off fix into a runbook entry the next engineer can use without paging me at three in the morning.

I also add a one-line note on the cost of getting this wrong. For set up anti phishing impersonation policy on Defender for Identity on a Defender for Identity unit, the cost is rarely the replacement part. It is the downtime, the second site visit, and the trust deficit you spend with whoever owns the asset when the fix does not hold. That framing keeps the next on-call from choosing the cheap-looking shortcut that ends up costing the most in elapsed hours and goodwill.